|
|
|
|
|||||
|
||||||
(no email)
Date: Tue Sep 25 2007 - 16:49:41 EDT
Dear HTB
My reply to Pee Way was not flaming unless, of course, you choose to see it
that way. Myself, and also several others, simply took exception to Pee
Wee's personal attack on Susan. He certainly has the right to disagree, but
not in such a personal manner. I thought of myself defending her right (and
all our rights) to speak passionately but impersonally on an issue without
receiving personal attacks for doing so.
I also don't see four sentences as "rambling", buy you can if you wish to.
As far as I am concerned this discussion is over. It is a waste of
bandwidth --- all of it -- your letter, my letter, and Pee Wee's letter.
They have nothing to do with "world cruising" so let's get off of it. That
was my initial point. 'Nuff said.
Best regards,
Jeff
Jeffrey M. Stander
s/v BEATRIX - KP44 #276 (1980)
http://www.svbeatrix.com
SKYPE ID: pacific_voyager
moderator for PetersonCutter Yahoo group
webmaster for http://www.kp44.org
-----Original Message-----
From: [mailto:]
On Behalf Of The Aryan
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2007 9:13 AM
To:
Subject: RE: [world-cruising] Re: I need Inverter/Charger recommendations
Jeff:
If Mr. Pee Wee's simple statement/opinion was "FLAMING" - what do you call
your rambling response to him???
HPB
|