Check out the bookstore at IRBS.com
| Home | Mailing Lists | Bookstore | Weather | Tide Predictions | Bowditch |

RE: [world-cruising] Re: ssb antennas....

(no email)
Date: Tue May 15 2007 - 17:45:16 EDT

  • Next message: grant harris: "RE: [world-cruising] Re: ssb antennas...."

    I wish someone else would weigh in on this. I am not an expert in antennas,
    and I too generally question conventional wisdom, but I don't just dismiss
    it either. If a wet salty string will work, then an insulated backstay
    should work also.

    I suspect the copper clad steel used by the military, if that is the case,
    adds strength while retaining the surface conductivity. It would be similar
    to Susan's dual antenna. But there are other considerations; such as having
    an uninsulated backstay next to the antenna wire. What effect does that
    have? Is the chainplate grounded or not? Is conductivity a big issue?
    There is NOT a lot of amperage running through the wire. I don't know
    answers to these questions. I do know that my backstay antennas works,
    looks neat, and is strong.

    So that is the bottom line for me. An insulated backstay appears to work
    just fine on my vessel and on others, and is no more a weak point in the
    rigging than any other rigging terminal. For Susan to say "they do fail, not
    if, but when" applies to every rigging wire on the boat. Don't be afraid of
    an insulated backstay. If failure is an equal probability at every swage or
    terminal, then yes, an insulated backstay is twice as likely to fail, but it
    is still a small number which can be mitigated by close inspection and good
    workmanship. On my boat I have 20 points of rigging failure with an
    insulated backstay, 18 without. The overall risk has gone up by about 10%.
    This issue is not one of backstay antennas, but of inspecting and replacing
    old rigging.

    Regards

    Jeff

    Jeffrey M. Stander
    listserv moderator and webmaster
    s/v BEATRIX - KP44 #276 (1980)
    SKYPE ID: pacific_voyager
    www.kp44.org
    www.svbeatrix.com
     

    -----Original Message-----
    From: susan meckley [mailto:]
    Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2007 12:35 PM
    To:
    Subject: [world-cruising] Re: ssb antennas....

    I would never recommend cutting the back stay for an insulator...they do
    fail, not if, but when. However, that being said, if one must use the
    backstay for an antenna, be sure to use the insulators such as Sta-lock
    provides.
      It is always wiser to run a separate antenna wire. Good results can be
    otained with a string (soaked in salt water) as an antenna, when conditions
    are good...I have tried it.
       
      But...when conditions are marginal, you want everything possible going for
    you...COPPER from the radio to the upper insulator
       
      I wonder why the military and commercial shortwave stations use "copper
    clad steel" if steel such as the backstay, is ok then why waste the money
    to use copper clad steel.
       
      BUT, in electronics, if it works don't change it untill it does not work
    and you have to do something.
       
      Nuff said on this subject
       
      Bye peoples...heading out to sea in 10 days....Johnston Island KH3
       
      Susan, W7KFI
      USSV Dharma

    If you don't change direction you will arrive exactly where you're headed!!
     
    Susan Meckley, Skipper
    USSV Dharma

     
    ---------------------------------
    It's here! Your new message!
    Get new email alerts with the free Yahoo! Toolbar.

    [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

     
    Yahoo! Groups Links


  • Next message: grant harris: "RE: [world-cruising] Re: ssb antennas...."

    | Home | Mailing Lists | Bookstore | Weather | Tide Predictions | Bowditch | Trawlerworld |