Next message: cirejay: "[world-cruising] Re: Emergency water"
On 4/9/06, cirejay <> wrote:
>
> Len, I'm all for redundancy but, for the life of me, I can't figure
> why, with all the money you seem to be shelling out (based on other
> post) you wouldn't have a the 06 RO watermaker. They are relatively
> cheap and they work in the dark, in rough conditions - not unusual
> in a life raft - and on cloudy days.
>
The military approaches this issue assuming the realistic possibility that a
pilot in the water could be injured and unable to endure continuous pumping
requirements. I could see a similar situation when a boat is abandoned.
Every "solution" has its positive and negative aspects. Probably the safest
path is to choose redundancy.
Again, for the record, I just discovered this product after reading a local
newspaper article. I have no connection with the company and I have no
experience with their products.
--
Best,
Bryan Genez
"Capella" V40-158
New Bern, NC
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/world-cruising/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
