|
|
|
|
|||||
|
||||||
From: Mike D. (no email)
Date: Wed Feb 01 2006 - 19:39:48 EST
Bryan
In my original post I was referring more to its toxicity than its
degradability but I might add that I much rather my boat be recycled after
I'm gone instead of land filled......one approved for toxic waist I'm sure
Mike D.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bryan Genez" <>
To: <>
Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2006 8:04 AM
Subject: Re: [world-cruising] wood VS steel as natural
> On 1/31/06, Ken James <> wrote:
>>
>> It's ALL natual! ,<G> After all, it is only a question of man-processed
>> or
>> other processed...and aren't WE natrual? -Ken
>>
>
> Perhaps the original poster meant "biodegradable". Wood, steel, and
> aluminum - "aluminium" for some of you ;) - all fall into that category.
> FRP does not...or at least, it's decay cycle is quite a bit longer than
> the
> others.
>
> --
> Best,
> Bryan Genez
> "Capella" V40-158
> New Bern, NC
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/world-cruising/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|