Check out the bookstore at IRBS.com
| Home | Mailing Lists | Bookstore | Weather | Tide Predictions | Bowditch |

[world-cruising] Anchoring technique, was: Re: Anchor snubber

From: Len den Besten (no email)
Date: Sun Jan 02 2005 - 08:21:06 EST

  • Next message: christopher_slaney: "[world-cruising] Anyone own a Stamas 44 ketch?"

    Hi Joe,

    I didn't mean to belittle anyones advice and surely
    not Bryans... :)
    I'm sorry if my writing gave that impression...

    You say you use a snubber to prevent the anchor coming
    loose in high windspeed. I think it only protects your
    material from hard shocks. When the chain is in a
    straight line due to wind or swell I expect the anchor
    to come loose in any case cause of the angle of the
    anchor-rode, even if you use a snubber.

    I think it would be nice to elaborate on this topic,
    even if it is discussed in previous threads.
    I'd like to know the various (?) views in this group
    about proper anchoring technique.

    We use a 1500 watt windlass on a 50k lbs boat so we
    use caution. A brutal hydraulic system would be nice
    but hey you can't have everything... I'm happy to have
    a remote control near the wheel, with a chainmeter.
    For sand and weeds we use a 77 lbs Bugelanchor
    (German) as our first. Cuts through weeds like nothing
    else and is fine, only in mud it won't hold cause of
    it's little holding-surface in square inches. Second
    anchor is a nice big Lewmar, a 105 lbs CQR.

    We choose our preferred position from expected
    winddirection and speed, current, depth, and the
    ability to make a 360. Then we move up wind and on the
    spot go into reverse.
    When stopped we lower the anchor, avoiding piling up
    chain cause it can get tangled. We feed chain while
    moving backwards in a way it isn't pulled tight and
    also isn't piling up. When circumstances, wind,
    current allow we move backwards slowly.

    When enough chain is fed (5-7 times depth) we come to
    a stop, close the separate chain-stopping-clamp and
    that way avoid the load on the windlass. In reverse
    again and when the anchor bites we give full reverse
    for a minute and look at a fixed point ashore. The
    feeling I get on that moment stays with me during my
    stay.

    When it's soso I bring out the CQR with the dingy
    using nylon rope in a V-shape. We never use a double
    anchor (attached next to each other with say 5 meters
    space) cause it's a pain when you need to leave.
    We'll also "invest" a few amphours using the
    gps-anchor alarm, connected to my speaker system so I
    really do wake up when alarm goes off.

    When the spot isn't protected all round and wind is
    forecasted I might add a 12mm nylon line with two
    harps on both ends. I just use it in two links that
    are more apart from each other then the length of the
    rope (+/- 3 feet).

    When we leave one of us is on the bow and makes
    armsigns, see below. When the anchor has dug in really
    deeply we reel in as much chain as possible, close the
    clamp and push the anchor out with the diesel. With
    the short chain the anchor-rode will rise so the
    anchor will come loose.

    About arm-signs, I found a description in another
    group. We think it's useful, particularly in cases
    when it's windy.

    ---------quote; I've lost the author's name----------
    Believe it or not, hand signals are internationally
    standardized and used for things like crane
    operations, where there's commonly somebody
    (the signaler) at the point where the load is going
    and somebody else (the crane driver) who runs the
    crane in response to the hand signals.
    The driver is frequently working 'blind', i.e., he
    can't see the load at all -- so the signals must be
    pretty good! Here are dome of the more salient ones:

    Arm extended -- go that way (i.e., extended to right,
    go right;
    extended toward the stern, reverse)
    Arm bent at elbow -- go other way (i.e., if using
    right arm, go left)
    Palm down, patting motion -- slow down
    Palm up, patting motion -- speed up
    Twirling index finger in any direction -- go this way,
    SLOWLY
    Opening and closing fingers against thumb, with arm
    signalling direction -- move a small amount in
    indicated direction, then stop
    Closed fist -- STOP

    To these, we've added 2 more, specifically related to
    anchoring:

    Motion of hand vertically, from highest extent down to
    knees: Anchor rode is "up and down"; hold position if
    possible

    Sweeping arm horizontally -- anchor's aweigh; carry on
    at slow speed

    And one, for safety when a line is under or near the
    hull:

    Hand slash across throat -- STOP PROPELLOR (neutral or
    engine stop)

    In the case of the crane operators (and also on our
    boat) the signals refer to the _outcome_, not to the
    action taken by the operator. For example, in our
    case the closed fist means "Stop the boat" NOT "Put
    the engine in neutral." The driver generally puts the
    engine in revers, and, monitoring a point on the shore
    or looking at the water alongside, puts the engine in
    neutral when the boat has stopped. With
    a less experienced driver, it might be better to think
    of the signals as rudder and engine commands, so the
    closed fist would mean "Put the engine in neutral".
    This requires the signaller to send LOTS more signals,
    as "Reverse" (arm toward stern) becomes "Neutral" when
    the boat comes to a stop, etc.) This, it seems to me,
    could cause
    problems when the signaller gets tied up in other
    things, such as a jammed windlass, and can't easily
    give the next comand at the right time.

    In any case, you should decide upon (and stick to)
    which convention you are using -- do the signals
    communicate boat actions, or rudder commands?

    -----------end quote------------

    I'd like comments.

    Regards,
    Len
    S/v Present

    --- Joe & Lynn Jelinski <> wrote:

    > Len -
    >
    > Bryan's advice has been pretty solid for us. I
    > listen a little more carefully to a guy who has
    > survived a few tours of sea duty in the Coast
    > Guard, since they experience a lot of the same
    > conditions we boaters see, and some that are much
    > worse.
    >
    > We always use a rope snubber, in addition to the
    > relying on the nice soft chain catenary (which I
    > agree provides a great amount of "give"). Our
    > snubber has 1/2-inch rope and also incorporates one
    > of the rubber "mooring compensators" in-line, to
    > give additional stretch.
    > When the wind really pipes up and the anchor chain
    > gets bar-tight, then without a snubber there
    > is a harder shock on the anchor with each wave,
    > which contributes to its pulling out. At that
    > point it's too late to do anything other than start
    > the engine and try to re-anchor.
    >
    > We experienced this high-wind phenomenon at three AM
    > one lovely night last April in the Dry Tortugas,
    > when the wind, in an unforecasted event, got to
    > hurricane strength and our old reliable CQR dragged
    > for the first time ever, snubber or no. But at
    > that point it's really a matter of how hard
    > the pull on the chain is before the shock absorbent
    > factors are used up and you're tugging directly on
    > the hook. For what it's worth, we take the
    > precaution of using a snubber, but on most nights
    > you're exactly right, you just don't need one.
    >
    > Fair winds,
    >
    > Joe
    > s/v Sunshine
    >
    > At 04:42 AM 1/1/2005, you wrote:
    > >Bryan,
    > >I only think of a "snubber" when the chain would be
    > >snapping as result of a relatively short, straight
    > >line it's in. That doesn't occur too often in my
    > >life.
    > >The curved line and the weight of the chain produce
    > >a nice soft brake for me in normal conditions.
    > >What I do is make sure the load isn't on the
    > >windlass and thats about it.
    > >Just my 2 cts.
    > >
    > >Happy new year,
    > >Len
    > >S/v Present
    > >
    > >
    > >--- In , Bryan Genez
    > <capella at c dot dot dot >
    > >wrote:
    > >
    > > > Hmmm.... I've always believed that the purpose
    > > > of the snubber was to stretch under load, and
    > > > reduce the shock load that chain (which doesn't
    > > > stretch) puts on the boat as it surges. I've
    > > > been using 1/2 inch (12mm)nylon, but
    > > > occasionally wonder if I should go smaller.
    > > > 5/8 inch seems pretty large, unless you're
    > > > sailing a megayacht.
    > > >
    > > > Thoughts?
    > > >
    > > > --
    > > > Best,
    > > >
    > > > Bryan Genez (KB3HMZ)
    > > > "Capella" Valiant 40 #158
    > > > Annapolis, MD

     
    Yahoo! Groups Links

    <*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
        http://groups.yahoo.com/group/world-cruising/

    <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
        

    <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
        http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
     


  • Next message: christopher_slaney: "[world-cruising] Anyone own a Stamas 44 ketch?"

    | Home | Mailing Lists | Bookstore | Weather | Tide Predictions | Bowditch | Trawlerworld |