|
|
|
|
|||||
|
||||||
Subject: Re: Re(2): [worldcruising] Lanoline as a replacment for antifoul
From: R Hepler (roberthepler@XXX.XXX)
Date: Mon Jan 07 2002 - 19:05:29 EST
Now don't all you folks go getting chapped and irritated or we'll really
have a debate about lanolin-vs-desinex on our errrrr... hands ;-)
George: lighten up, eh?
At 04:00 PM 1/7/02 -0800, you wrote:
>Gg,
>
>Isn't your comment a tad rude??
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "George Geist" <scaramouche@XXX.XXX>
>To: <jharkins@XXX.XXX>
>
> > jharkins@XXX.XXX writes:
> > >Practical Sailor did a test on desinex (?) and also found it
> > >useless, as I recall.
> >
> > That's just a tad irrelevant, isn't it? Desinex is NOT lanolin. Gg
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @XXX.XXX
=====================================
to unsubscribe email to: worldcruising-unsubscribe@onelist.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|