![]() |
|
|||||
|
||||||
Subject: Re(2): [worldcruising] Lanoline as a replacment for antifoul
From: George Geist (scaramouche@XXX.XXX)
Date: Mon Jan 07 2002 - 11:34:14 EST
worldcruising@XXX.XXX writes:
>locals around here were touting "Desenex," a baby-diaper
>anti-rash cream, as a great anti-foul for props. I tried it; it was
>useless
>as anti-foul, but the new-growth barnacles were all free of rashes.
Lanolin is wool-fat from sheep.
Desenex contains no lanolin, nix, nada. Another baby-bottom cream
made in Germany "Penaten" does contain lanolin and that's what I've
been using on underwater metal parts. Not only do I not have any
barnacles (I sail in fresh water only) but our equivalent bottom
growth, Zebra-Mussels, stay clear of my shaft, prop, rudder-hinges
etc. The few Zebra-Mussels harvested in my immediate neighbourhood,
however, have a bit of a mutton taste. <grin>
> George of Scaramouche1, wintering Lake Ontario, Canada
>If you're not living on the edge, you're taking up too much space.
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Tiny Wireless Camera under $80!
Order Now! FREE VCR Commander!
Click Here - Only 1 Day Left!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/WoOlbB/7.PDAA/ySSFAA/_0TolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->
=====================================
to unsubscribe email to: worldcruising-unsubscribe@onelist.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|