RE: single vs dual dipsticks

On 6/3/99 10:05 Joe Engel wrote:

>an auxiliary dipstick just could not provide the checking capability of a
>true second dipstick.

Chuckle!

Could the provision for 2nd dipstick simply be to allow installer to
locate the dipstick where it is easy to access?

Cheers,

Steve

------------------------------------------------
Stephen C. Darden Email:

• Next message: accessmail: "Re: single vs dual dipsticks"
• Previous message: John Gamble: "Dipstick"
• Next in thread: accessmail: "Re: single vs dual dipsticks"