![]() |
|
|||||
|
||||||
From: Arild Jensen (no email)
Date: Fri Mar 07 2008 - 14:32:24 EST
> -----Original Message-----
> If this unit truly did what some listees postulate, why, all the RO
> manufacturers would instantly be out of business and yours truly would be
> out 10 times that much for his watermaker. Methinks 40 psi RO
> kinder falls into the same general category as cold fusion. Not totally
> disproven but a bit far fetched.
> Regards.
> Larry
REPLY
Not quite as bad as cold fusion. I lived in a house that was equipped with
such an RO filter.
The trouble is, it wasted ten times as much water as it filtered through the
RO membrane.
Either way you look at it, this is a very wasteful device that uses too much
power and to omuhc water.
Perhaps the "marine" versions of RO are over priced. But unless you want to
build your own, which is not that dificult, yo upay for the convenience of
having someone else do it gor you.
In a house it wastes a lot of water. If the house is on a well the well may
not be capable of delivering so much quantity.
In a boat you woudl need to generate extra power to drive th epump.
That being the case, you might as well get the most efficienct pump you can
find to deliver enough potabel water using the least amount of energy.
regards
Arild
_______________________________________________
http://lists.samurai.com/mailman/listinfo/trawlers-and-trawlering
To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options (get password, change email address, etc) go to: http://lists.samurai.com/mailman/options/trawlers-and-trawlering
Trawlers & Trawlering and T&T are trademarks of Water World
Productions. Unauthorized use is prohibited.
|