![]() |
|
|||||
|
||||||
From: C. Marin Faure (no email)
Date: Sun Mar 02 2008 - 00:54:18 EST
>It all makes sense except the dual engines. Why would anyone want
twice the maintenance, twice the oil at oil change etc, etc. Since
most engine failures are fuel related; two dead engines are the same
as one dead engine.
All the people I know who have had to shut an engine down, including
ourselves, have had to do so because of cooling problems. I have not
yet personally met anyone in our area who's had an engine shut down
due to a fuel problem. The people with twins, including ourselves,
came home on the other engine. The people with singles and sailboats
came home on the end of a rope, and in one case I know about went
onto the rocks before a tow could arrive.
I'm not saying that fuel problems are less likely to occur than a
cooling problem, nor am I saying that two engines are better than
one. I'm just saying that assuming both engines in a twin will
usually have problems at the same time due to fuel is not a smart
assumption to base a single vs twin boat-buying decision on.
____________________
C. Marin Faure
GB36-403 "La Perouse"
Bellingham, Washington
_______________________________________________
http://lists.samurai.com/mailman/listinfo/trawlers-and-trawlering
To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options (get password, change email address, etc) go to: http://lists.samurai.com/mailman/options/trawlers-and-trawlering
Trawlers & Trawlering and T&T are trademarks of Water World
Productions. Unauthorized use is prohibited.
|