| Home | Mailing Lists | Bookstore | Weather | Tide Predictions | Bowditch |

T&T: Batteries

From: Candy Chapman and Gary Bell (no email)
Date: Fri Feb 01 2008 - 17:17:20 EST

  • Next message: Peter Gelinas: "Re: T&T: Free Charts"

    <snip>
    l
    Greast post by Bob Austin..Thanks for the effort!

    REPLY: Hear! Hear! Thanks Bob!

    <snip>
    The only point I'd add that is plate thickness is intentionally different for
    start versus deep cycle batteries. The logic is that for slow (low current)
    discharge deep cycle applications ion migration can replenish the chemical
    reactions deep inside thick plates; for high discharge (big currents, like
    starting) thin plates are preferred to power repeated starting attempts...

    REPLY: Yes, that's right. Thick plates for deep cycle type batteries, where
    small currents are drawn for extended times and the battery will regularly be
    drawn down to a very low state of charge. Another reason for the thicker
    plate (beyond ion migration from the interior of the thick lead plate to
    replenish the surface where the electrochemical reaction that produces the
    electric current happens) is that when the battery is regularly discharged to
    a very low state, the plates actually begin to warp and also to spall off
    chunks of lead, ultimately to short out against their oppositely charged
    partner. End of battery. Start batteries provide a huge current for a very
    short time, and are seldom discharged very deeply. To produce lots of current
    requires a lot of plate surface area, and since they are seldom deeply
    discharged -- a larger number of thinner plates is in order (more surface
    area). They are of course more sensitive to deep discharge breakdown.
    Regular automotive batteries are start type, and thus provide poorer service
    when used deep discharge mode.

    <snip>
     ...deep cycle I've used (pair of 8D's in parallel) start my
    8V71TI's just fine...Powermaster, Interstate, Exide...but they all last only
    about five years. VERY disappointing because I do NOT abuse them. And I can't
    find your latest invoice, Candy thinks it was for $7.00 or soOf
    course I have no idea if they are REALLY deep cycle designs. But I use mine
    steadily six months full time annually.

    REPLY: Did you just say you were using deep cycle batteries to start your DD?
    Might that explain your poor performance? If they were only used as start
    batteries, regular automotive type, or marinized start type batteries would be
    my choice. Also, isn't the starter on most DD's a 24 volt beast? Did you
    mean parallel or series?

    Robin also said <no snipping here>
    I also have read that some manufacturers use different mixes of acids and
    acid
    concentrations so specific gravity can vary among brands....

    REPLY: Interesting. Could you suggest where you found that? My
    understanding is that automotive and marine wet cell batteries all share
    exactly the same chemistry, which has evolved over a very long time to produce
    the same specific gravity vs. charge state curve for everyone. Refinememts
    various manufacturers may tout make insignificant differences in the actual
    electrochemistry, and no significant difference in the specific gravity
    regime. Intense efforts to improve battery performance recently (for electric
    cars and such), which long ago abandoned lead acid wet cell types as being
    about as good as they will every get. There are newer chemistry batteries:
    nickle cadmium, nickle metal hydride (cell phones to hybrid cars),lithium ion
    (computers, newer cell phones and soon hybrid cars), and a slew of emerging
    new and exotic chemical brews, but I don't think any of them are configured as
    open wet cell batteries where one could stick a hydrometer in and check the
    charge, and certainly not something offered at competetive pricing for the
    marine market. I've been wrong before, but I haven't come across significant
    departures from the modern standard specific gravity regime, at least for
    batteries that we could use and afford. The Gell Cell and Absorbed Glass Mat
    batteries all share the same basic chemistry as the good old flooded wet cell,
    however their different handling of the wet electrolyte permits different
    charge rates and mounting options. AGM batteries the gas produced has lots of
    room to expand into, since the electrolyte can be thought of as being in a
    saturated and then wrung out fiberglass gauze held between the plates, so the
    ions can follow the wet paths and the gas can move away from the plates into
    the 'air' spaces in the 'fabric'. The lower internal pressure allowes a
    virtually completely sealed case, the trapping of the electrolyte in the glass
    mat allows the battery to be run upside down without plates poking out of the
    juice, and moving the gas away from the plates allows more electrochemical
    reactions unblocked by bubbles on the plate, thus higher charge (and somewhat
    higher discharge) rates. Gel cells hold the electrlyte in 'jello', allowing
    the battery to tip over without issues, and they engineer in greater 'air
    space' above the gel to allow sealing the case.

    That old drone,
    Mister Science
    _________________________________________________________________

    09.67lo
    _______________________________________________
    http://lists.samurai.com/mailman/listinfo/trawlers-and-trawlering

    To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options (get password, change email address, etc) go to: http://lists.samurai.com/mailman/options/trawlers-and-trawlering

    Trawlers & Trawlering and T&T are trademarks of Water World
    Productions. Unauthorized use is prohibited.


  • Next message: Peter Gelinas: "Re: T&T: Free Charts"



    | Home | Mailing Lists | Bookstore | Weather | Tide Predictions | Bowditch | Trawlerworld |