![]() |
|
|||||
|
||||||
From: (no name) (no email)
Date: Tue Nov 06 2007 - 20:07:39 EST
I just don't understand why an insurance company would differentiate between
someone who owns no residential property and travels most of the time and
one who owns no residential property and stays put.
Many of us had residential property and sold it or residential property that
we converted it into rental property and got tired of the landlord hassle
and sold it.
Why doesn't the question revolve around being landed (or not) instead of
where we stay?
R. Lee
************************************** See what's new at http://www.aol.com
_______________________________________________
http://lists.samurai.com/mailman/listinfo/trawlers-and-trawlering
To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options (get password, change email address, etc) go to: http://lists.samurai.com/mailman/options/trawlers-and-trawlering
Trawlers & Trawlering and T&T are trademarks of Water World
Productions. Unauthorized use is prohibited.
|