| Home | Mailing Lists | Bookstore | Weather | Tide Predictions | Bowditch |

Re: T&T: Repair vs. replace

From: (no name) (no email)
Date: Tue Jul 03 2007 - 09:59:31 EDT

  • Next message: Mike Maurice: "T&T: More Video Resources"

    In a message dated 7/3/07 12:01:21 AM, Arild writes:

    >
    > REPLY
    > Probably because equipment back then was actually designed to be repaired.
    >
    > We are all being victimized by the cult of mediocrity.
    > Because enough people are willing to accept mediocre, slip shod products
    > that sort of work, it has becoming nearly impossible to find manufacturers
    > who make really good quality products.
    >
    >

    It's not a cult of mediocrity per se. Reliability analysis was once one of my
    responsibilities in a moderately long stint in the military-industrial
    complex. Repairability works against reliability. Equipment that is designed to be
    repaired has socketed electrical components and test points. Many functions are
    carried out by discrete components which can be replaced individually.
    Mechanical parts are secured by screws or bolts and cases are designed to be taken
    apart. All are potential sources of failure.

    Equipment designed for reliability has electrical parts soldered in place, no
    sockets. Integrated circuitry tends to be used instead of individual
    components. Mechanical components are spot welded in position or otherwised secured so
    that they can't be removed. Cases are sealed, often glued or welded shut. It
    is also cheaper to make this type of device on an automated production line.

    Although the first type of equipment can be repaired quickly, its MTBF is
    often much shorter. The two different classes of equipment give rise to different
    maintenance philosophies. To fix the repairable stuff, you need tools and a
    supply of spair parts plus trained technicians who know how to fix it when it
    breaks. The repair pholosophy for the second type of component is simple
    replaicement of the failed module. No repair is attempted. Often it is impossible.
    Obviously the requirement for technical skills on the part of the repairman are
    much lower. However, you do need a big inventory of replacement modules. The
    military leans toward the second method.

    As fewer and fewer young people choose to become repair persons and/or
    maintenance technicians, industry tends to lean toward the replace rather than
    repair philosophy. It is often cheaper and quicker to throw away the old unit and
    substitute a new one rather than attempt a repair. Try to fix the
    microprocessor on an electrically controlled diesel. Have you had your car repaired
    recently? What did they do?

    Larry Z

    **************************************
     See what's free at
    http://www.aol.com.
    _______________________________________________
    http://lists.samurai.com/mailman/listinfo/trawlers-and-trawlering

    To unsubscribe send email to
     with the word
    UNSUBSCRIBE and nothing else in the subject or body of the message.

    Trawlers & Trawlering and T&T are trademarks of Water World
    Productions. Unauthorized use is prohibited.


  • Next message: Mike Maurice: "T&T: More Video Resources"



    | Home | Mailing Lists | Bookstore | Weather | Tide Predictions | Bowditch | Trawlerworld |