| Home | Mailing Lists | Bookstore | Weather | Tide Predictions | Bowditch |

Re: T&T: Insurance (Additionally Insured Marinas)

From: (no name) (no email)
Date: Tue Oct 31 2006 - 08:44:29 EST

  • Next message: (no email): "Re: T&T: Dinghy Towing Device - Toadster"

    Howdy All,

    Before this insurance thread burns out I would like to pose some questions
    to the group.

    Our marina was purchased earlier this season and we recently got a copy of
    the new contract. The New contract states that we must list the marina as an
    "additional insured".... along with lots of other requirements that I have
    never seen before. The marina's attorney stated that this was common
    practice and we needed to comply or leave. So we contacted our insurance
    company and they said that they would not comply and did not see it in our
    best interest to do so. This is how I felt. I understand the ramifications
    of insuring my kids on my vehicle. I am having difficulties with the concept
    of insuring a "Company" on a personal marine insurance contract. Too much
    can go wrong and for my insurance always to be at fault just does not sit
    right with me. So we contacted the Maryland Insurance Commissioner. To my
    surprise he was surprised the marine industry was doing this. He forwarded
    the contract to one of the Staff Attorney Generals. She contacted us, to
    pretty much state that there probably was nothing wrong with this clause and
    the contract in general was fairly rock solid with a 100% bias in the
    Marinas favor. Her suggestion was to seek a different marina. The
    Commissioners concern is if the marinas are strong arming the Insurance
    companies to comply, or the Insurance companies are getting kick backs from
    the marinas. If either is the case, then they have broken the law. Neither
    case really suits me. Trying to investigate or prove either of the 2 is not
    even something I would consider... He did recommend I file a claim with
    the States Attorney Generals Consumer Protection Agency as the wording
    struck a nerve with him but the issue was out of his jurisdiction.

    To me this all seems like a huge conflict of interest.

    Example that has me going No Thanks....

    The marina group that I am now a member, sunk a boat at their other marina.
    The story goes something like this so I am told.
    Customer "A" calls the boatel to have his boat put in the water in the
    evening. Customer "A" arrives after closing to use his boat. Customer "A"
    notices that his boat is still in the boatel. He calls the marina in the
    next morning to give them heck for the mishap. The Marina then realizes the
    boat sitting on the bottom is Customer "B's" because the marina put the
    wrong boat in and forgot the drain plug. So they call Customer "B". They
    charge him for Salvage, EPA fines, and tell him so sorry for the mistake but
    you need to file with your insurance company. He says no, my boat is not
    supposed to be anywhere near the water. So Customer "B" is in the process
    of suing the marina.... Granted this is a 3rd party story, but I worked at
    a Marina during my college days and have seen similar. Anyway, experience
    has probably given me a negative view of marinas. Life is too short to deal
    with irritations like this.

    I hate to think having to insure the Marina is common place everywhere....

    My question to the list is, "Is this "additional insured" as common as the
    marina's attorney stated?"
    I have contacted 8 Marinas so far and only 2 have it in the contract and
    both allow it to be waived since so many customers have complained.

    And the big question.... If it is common, are you comfortable having them
    being additionally insured?

    I have polled several members at my marina and am surprised this is of
    little concern to anyone there. So far I have gotten; This marina is the
    only public marina on the north shore of the Magothy so location wins for
    most of the members there.

    Any input is appreciated.

    If this has been discussed in the past I apologize. I looked but did not
    find anything .. if so just kindly point me in the right direction.

    Thanks
    David Parks
    Red Skies at Night
    31 Tiara Sportfish
     (mailto:)
     
    Hi David
     
    I think your mis understanding the situation naming the marina as additional
    insured does not mean you insure the marina. Right now the "insured" on your
    policy is you or you and the bank that holds the note. If you ad the marina
    it will be ATIMA (as there interests may appear) Which means that if your
    boat catches fire and destroys part of the marina the insurance company will be
    obligated to pay the marina directly for the loss. Lots of marinas do this I
    don't really like it either and a case could be made that it's not necessary.
    Since any loss to the marina would be covered by your liability your company
    would be obligated to pay them anyway.
     
    Brian Palmetto FL
    _______________________________________________
    http://lists.samurai.com/mailman/listinfo/trawlers-and-trawlering

    To unsubscribe send email to
     with the word
    UNSUBSCRIBE and nothing else in the subject or body of the message.

    Trawlers & Trawlering and T&T are trademarks of Water World
    Productions. Unauthorized use is prohibited.


  • Next message: (no email): "Re: T&T: Dinghy Towing Device - Toadster"



    | Home | Mailing Lists | Bookstore | Weather | Tide Predictions | Bowditch | Trawlerworld |