| Home | Mailing Lists | Bookstore | Weather | Tide Predictions | Bowditch |

Re: T&T: Keith's formula for catamarans

From: (no name) (no email)
Date: Thu Oct 26 2006 - 08:45:37 EDT

  • Next message: Randy Pickelmann: "T&T: How do you hold your mic?"

    In a message dated 10/26/06 12:01:10 AM,
     writes:

    > >
    > > I have applied Keith's Formula to an excell SS. Any thoughts on the
    > > validity of Keith's to a powercat? Coefficients?
    >
    > I am unfamiliar with this formula, and I generally suspect that catamaran
    > hulls are different enough from monohulls that great modifications would
    > need to be made to it to get realistic predictions.
    >
    >

    Keith's formula for relating speed, power, length, and displacement is
    described on p. 105 of "Skene's Elements of Yacht Design, 8th ed." revised by
    Francis S. Kinney. It is published by Dodd, Mead & Co., New York, ISBN:
    0-396-06582-1. The book also has a number of other techniques for calculating
    the power
    requirements of boats and is a compendium of material useful to yacht
    designers.

    I use the following formula: KTS = (LWL)^.5 x C x ((HP x
    1000)/D)^.333

    This is essentially Keith's formula restated for easy computer calculation.

    LWL is measured in feet.
    D is measured in lbs.
    C is a scaling constant which varies between 1.1 and 1.5 and must be
    determined by observation or experimentation with a specific type of boat.

    I use a constant of 1.18 for a typical displacement trawler hull. This is
    based on experience, not on theory. Lower values of the constant imply a more
    pessimistic outlook and prescribe more power for a given speed. Values above
    1.2
    tend to be too optimistic.

    The presence of arbitrary constants in an equation are a serious fudge
    factor. I was once told by a professor of mathematics that if you have two
    arbitrary
    constants in an equation, you can make the resulting curve look like a puppy
    dog, and if you throw in a third arbitrary constant, you can make it wag its
    tail.

    What the scaling constant in Keith's formula does is correct for difference
    in hull shape (prismatic coefficient, etc), hull condition (squeaky clean or
    barnacle covered), sea state (mill pond or "real world"), measurement units
    (statute miles, knots, kilometers, lbs., kilograms, tons, etc.), and propeller
    efficiency (usually assumed to be about 50%). All the basic formula does is
    provide the shape of the curve of increasing power requirement with speed for
    a
    hull of given length and displacement. The scaling constant changes the axes
    of
    the graph to meaningful units.

    The best way to use Keith's formula, or any similar formula, is to make exact
    measurements of a boat's power requirements at a specific speed and
    displacement. Then calculate the proper constant. Using this constant, power
    requirements (and fuel consumption) can then be estimated for that same hull
    for a range
    of speeds and displacements. You can generalize to other boats of the same
    general type with less accurate results. It would not do, however, to use
    Keith's formula to compare displacement, semi-displacement, and planing
    boats.

    Keith's formula makes no provision for the beam or shape of a hull. That is
    all handled by appropriate changes to the scaling constant. I assume that the
    formula would be applicable for catamarans or trimarans at displacement speeds
    with the right scaling constant but that would have to be determined by
    experiment.

    You can't accept any of the maritime formulas on blind faith but Keith's
    formula seems to be one of the more reliable ones for approximating power
    required
    to move a displacement hull. It considers LWL, displacement, speed, and
    power. Inherent in the calculations are assumptions made about propeller
    efficiency, specific hull configuration, units of measurement, and sea
    conditions. These
    are included in the scaling constant. Generally the mathematical formulas
    give results which are in error by no more than 10% when compared with actual
    in-water trials. Nothing beats actual tank tests or full scale prototypes,
    but
    using a computer is a lot cheaper.

    Larry Z
    _______________________________________________
    http://lists.samurai.com/mailman/listinfo/trawlers-and-trawlering

    To unsubscribe send email to
     with the word
    UNSUBSCRIBE and nothing else in the subject or body of the message.

    Trawlers & Trawlering and T&T are trademarks of Water World
    Productions. Unauthorized use is prohibited.


  • Next message: Randy Pickelmann: "T&T: How do you hold your mic?"



    | Home | Mailing Lists | Bookstore | Weather | Tide Predictions | Bowditch | Trawlerworld |