|
|
|
|
|||||
|
||||||
(no email)
Date: Thu Jun 29 2006 - 15:52:10 EDT
Regardless of which camp you are in, no one has really suggested using the
wrong size filter will cause any damage as long as the filters are changed
when required. I have 2 micron in now and will see how long they last
before needing replaced - I also decided to spare both sizes just so I have
a choice when I do replace them next time...
Greg Steckel
M/V Different Drummer
President 35 Sundeck
____________________
www.chesapeaketrawlering.com
www.chesapeakesailor.com
www.fmyc.org
-----Original Message-----
From: [mailto:]
Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2006 3:31 PM
To:
Subject: T&T: Racor 2 Micron vrs 10 Micron
Look, everyone gets to live with their own decisions.
If installing 2-micron primaries is a way to defer routine maintenance on
the secondary filters, its asking for trouble. Until I see some real
evidence (rather than supposition) that suggests there's a whole bunch of
junk bypassing a properly maintained 10-micron primary and clogging a
properly maintained 2-micron secondary, I'm going to follow the
recommendations of engine and filter manufacturers - especially since it's
their warranty money and R&D money on the line. I just don't think they'd
be making these recommendations if it wasn't sound advice - they would
stand to lose a lot and gain very little.
Just my opinion -
Peter
_www.SeaSkills.com_ (http://www.SeaSkills.com)
Hello Peter
There have been a lot of posts on this and you may be mixing up mine with
some others. I'm not suggesting that the traditional primary secondary
doesn't work or that the primary will allow large amounts of dirt to pass
thru and clog the secondary. If the traditional system is right both
filters will collect dirt as designed definitely no "Oh My Gawd" My
position is that the only advantage to the traditional system is more
filter area because both filters are working at the micron level installed.
The same thing can be accomplished by increasing filter area on a 2 micron
primary.
Unlike the "experts" in your link I believe the vacuum gauge is extremely
useful over the entire RPM range if you use it correctly. With new elements
in place I take readings at various RPM to get a baseline to work from I'm
more interested in change then the actual number. I also never suggested
that the final can be left in forever it won't need to be changed as often
as the primary but should be changed periodically so as not to deteriorate
from age or moisture.
The big difference in my way of thinking and yours or your "experts" can be
best understood 150 miles offshore on a snotty night. I can glance at a
vacuum gauge and know the overall condition of my fuel system and you
can't.
Brian Palmetto FL
_______________________________________________
http://lists.samurai.com/mailman/listinfo/trawlers-and-trawlering
To unsubscribe send email to
with the word UNSUBSCRIBE
and nothing else in the subject or body of the message.
Trawlers & Trawlering and T&T are trademarks of Water World Productions.
Unauthorized use is prohibited.
_______________________________________________
http://lists.samurai.com/mailman/listinfo/trawlers-and-trawlering
To unsubscribe send email to
with the word
UNSUBSCRIBE and nothing else in the subject or body of the message.
Trawlers & Trawlering and T&T are trademarks of Water World
Productions. Unauthorized use is prohibited.
|