| Home | Mailing Lists | Bookstore | Weather | Tide Predictions | Bowditch |

Re: T&T: How the List operates, Another perspective

From: Alex Hirsekorn (no email)
Date: Tue Aug 02 2005 - 23:59:10 EDT

  • Next message: Glenn Williams: "Re: T&T: How the List operates, Another perspective"

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Georgs Kolesnikovs" <>
    >
    > It is precisely for the reasons illustrated in this thread
    > (Telling the truth isn't vendor bashing!!!)--that some
    > people will always attempt to abuse the List--that I, as the list
    > owner, have appointed a team of volunteers to run the List and to
    > take action as needed to ensure that the List remains the best such
    > forum on the Net.
    >
    HiHo Listoids,

    I've been biting my virtual tongue ever since this discussion started
    but, in the interests of manageable blood pressure, I just have to
    comment from the perspective of a former T&T listmaster.

    To begin with, this sort of thing has come up before and will probably
    come up again. Each such discussion is characterized by a small
    faction of posters making claims and demands based on a complete and
    total misunderstanding of the points at issue - to wit:

    1. Any attempt to control ANY aspect of the discussion is some sort of
    violation of the members' right to free speech. - The fallacy here is
    that there are any free speech rights on this type of forum; there are
    not! Members of any of the Trawlers & Trawlering family of mailings
    lists post messages at the pleasure of the list owner (Georgs
    Kolesnikovs). Further, Georgs has, as he explained in his post
    yesterday, appointed a group of volunteers to interpret, implement,
    and enforce the list rules and policies that have been in place since
    the list was started. BTW: Each new member of the list is sent a copy
    of those rules and policies on joining.

    2. That list policy discourages negative comments about products or
    vendors. - That has never been the case. What IS expected of our
    members is that such negative comments be restricted to factual
    information with a minimum of 'editorializing'. There is a very good
    reason for this. As mentioned above, these lists are privately owned
    entities and, as such, they provide a target for anyone of a litigious
    turn of mind who feels he or his business has been slighted. Please
    keep in mind that a lawsuit wouldn't have to be successful to put the
    list(s) out of business!

    In light of those points, most people would have to concede that list
    administrators have taken a remarkably 'hands-off' approach to the day
    to day running of the list. Of the three T&T listmasters (Georgs, Bob,
    & myself) I was probably by far the most stringent about enforcing the
    rules but even so, I can count on the fingers of one hand the number
    of threads or posters that were restricted during my tenure. It has
    always been the [unwritten] policy of these lists that the members can
    almost always be trusted to comport themselves as ladies and
    gentlemen. I won't presume to speak for Georgs, Bob, or any of the
    Help Team members but I've always found it, not only unseemly, but
    also profoundly disappointing when affluent, mature, and presumably
    responsible adults find it necessary to resort to the sort of
    invective seen in this discussion. It has been our good fortune as a
    group to have members who are usually so willing to exercise self
    restraint. Arguably, it is that self restraint that makes this recent
    discussion stand out.

    Another thing that I find disappointing, if not surprising, is that
    those people who are the most vocal about perceived problems with list
    rules or their implementation are never heard from when the call goes
    out for volunteers to help with list administration. Even when things
    are going smoothly there's a lot of behind the scenes 'nuts & bolts'
    stuff that needs doing. When things aren't so smooth the workload
    increases rapidly. Here's an example: Some time ago, while I was still
    listmaster, we were contacted by a small manufacturer who claimed that
    his product was unfairly criticized in a post that had been made over
    5 years previous - legal action was threatened. I personally spent
    something like 30 hours on this one issue; researching the original
    post & its context, conferring with the admin team, and corresponding
    with the complainant. In that case the post in question WAS a simple
    statement of one person's experience with a particular product and
    there happened to be numerous positive comments about the same product
    at the time of the original post. All that made it 'easy' to resolve -
    God forbid we ever get a difficult one! I only bring this up to point
    out that your actions don't take place in a vacuum. If your post
    unnecessarily upsets a supplier/manufacturer/vendor it results in a
    good deal of extra work for a real flesh and blood person. Again, the
    Trawlers & Trawlering lists have had the good fortune to have a cadre
    of members who have been willing to give their time to the
    administration of the list. OTOH: I personally find it bothersome when
    people who complain about something are unwilling to put any
    additional effort into the situation at hand.

    Resignedly yours,

    Alex
    _______________________________________________
    http://lists.samurai.com/mailman/listinfo/trawlers-and-trawlering

    To unsubscribe send email to
     with the word
    UNSUBSCRIBE and nothing else in the subject or body of the message.

    Trawlers & Trawlering and T&T are trademarks of Water World
    Productions. Unauthorized use is prohibited.


  • Next message: Glenn Williams: "Re: T&T: How the List operates, Another perspective"



    | Home | Mailing Lists | Bookstore | Weather | Tide Predictions | Bowditch | Trawlerworld |