| Home | Mailing Lists | Bookstore | Weather | Tide Predictions | Bowditch |

TWL: Re: 1 prop vs. 2 props?

From: Larry Achtemichuk (no email)
Date: Tue Dec 16 2003 - 02:46:39 EST

  • Next message: Frank Bales: "TWL: RE: Providing clean oil (was Solera...)"

    I have had a GB36 with a Cummins 210 for 3+ years. I run it at
    1900-2000 rpm and this gives me approx 8.3 knots. IF I need to keep up
    to some GB42s I will run at 2150 and approach 8.8-9 knots. I was out
    this summer for 8 weeks and did used the entire range of RPM and speeds.
    I used between 2.6 and 2.9 Imperial gals/hour (this should be between
    3.25 and 3.6 US gals/hour) My guess that my averag spped would have
    been in the 8.5 range although with all the currents on the way to and
    from the Queen Charlotte's this is a bit tough to read. This is just
    one data point but if you take Marin Faure's data point for his twin 120
    Lehman's you could conclude that the single 210 uses about 2/3 the fuel
    of twin 120's but there may be many variables.
     
    My biggest concern with 2 engines on a boat like the GB36 is that they
    would fill the engine room. I am 6' 2" and the engine room, while snug
    is easy to work in.
    Also you reduce your maintenance time by half, a non trivial
    consideration.
     
    The biggest issue with the single is the handling in adverse conditions
    (cross current or stiff breeze when docking). I would go for a bow
    thruster rather than a second engine. Of course if you lean to
    spirituality, having a single engine is excellent for building character
    and soul, so you would lose this if you went with a thruster :-)
    Although once you get through the learning curve if it is OK. The
    previous owner talked me out of installing a thruster as part of the
    sale, and I am OK with the choice. No permanent gelcoat dings in 3+
    years.
     
    PassageMaker did an article and a test on docking an identical twin and
    a single + thruster and found the handling in close quarters to be very
    comparable.
     
    Many boats (like the GB) do not give you twin keels if you go with twin
    engines, so for these boats a single engine has the advantage in that
    the prop and rudder are very well protected relative to their twin
    engine models. Marin has, in my view, pointed out that fuel issues and
    cooling system faults are most of the risks to a single engine, but if
    your fuel is bad, both engines will stop. My action has been to
    install dual Racors to give me some on th fly change over to a second
    filter and some time to change filters or get to port. Preventitive
    maintenance on the cooling system, perhaps with some temp sensors at the
    exhaust elbow to give you earlier warning may be the next thing to
    consider.
     
    Good luck in your decision, neither option is a bad one if it gets you
    out in the water and off the streets......
     
    Larry Achtemichuk
    West Vancouver, BC
    GB36 Tiger Lily
    _______________________________________________
    http://lists.samurai.com/mailman/listinfo/trawler-world-list

    To Unsubscribe send email to
    Include the word "Unsubscribe" (and nothing else) in the subject or body of the message.


  • Next message: Frank Bales: "TWL: RE: Providing clean oil (was Solera...)"



    | Home | Mailing Lists | Bookstore | Weather | Tide Predictions | Bowditch | Trawlerworld |