| Home | Mailing Lists | Bookstore | Weather | Tide Predictions | Bowditch |

TWL: Re: "Solera" oil change system

From: C. Marin Faure (no email)
Date: Sat Dec 13 2003 - 00:33:51 EST

  • Next message: Paul Turner: "Re: TWL: Dinghy Davit"

    From:
    Subject: TWL: "Solera" oil change system

    >Every 20 engine hours I bleed a
    scant quart of oil out of the engine by opening the valve slightly and
    directing the flow into an empty 1 quart plastic oil bottle. I then add a
    new quart of oil to the engine. The capacity of the engine's small sump is
    5 quarts so most of the oil is effectively changed every 100 hours.

    Hmm..... I wonder about this. A friend used to change the oil in his car
    every 3000 miles, but he'd ony change the filter every other oil change. I
    guess to save money. Anyway, he stopped doing this when someone pointed
    out that what he was doing on the "in between" oil changes was essentially
    pouring a guart of dirty oil into the new oil.

    So I wonder if the method you describe actually gives you any real benefit.
    You take out one quart of dirty oil, leave in four, which contaminates the
    quart of clean oil a fair amount I should think. Then you keep run the
    engine another twenty hours, putting more soot, acids, whatever, into the
    oil, then you drain out one quart, add one fresh quart which is promptly
    contaminated by the remaing four quarts of dirty oil, run twenty more
    hours, and so on. It seems to me that what you are really doing is
    maintaining a permanently dirty oil condition in the engine. Maybe not as
    dirty as the oil would be at the end of a 100 hour oil change interval, but
    pretty dirty nevertheless since your ratio of clean oil to dirty oil is
    never greater than one to four.

    If you run the engine for 100 hours or whatever oil change interval you
    use, then change it all plus the filter, you now start with completely
    clean oil. Over the next 100 hours, the oil gradually gets dirty, and then
    you change it again.

    I guess the question to be answered is, which process gives the engine more
    "time" to run on clean, or relatively clean oil? I'm thinking it takes
    some sort of math formula to figure this out, and there's a good reason I'm
    a film producer and not a mathematician. But it would seem to me it would
    be better for an engine to get clean oil periodically instead of running
    forever on dirty oil.

    Now I understand your reasoning for doing this to avoid having to change
    the oil at an inconvenient time during a longer voyage, and in this context
    it seems like a good solution. But if someone decided this would be a
    smart way to operate all the time as a way to avoid messy oil changes or
    save money, I wonder if they would be making a mistake.

    _______________
    C. Marin Faure
    GB36-403 "La Perouse"
    Bellingham, WA
    _______________________________________________
    http://lists.samurai.com/mailman/listinfo/trawler-world-list

    To Unsubscribe send email to
    Include the word "Unsubscribe" (and nothing else) in the subject or body of the message.


  • Next message: Paul Turner: "Re: TWL: Dinghy Davit"



    | Home | Mailing Lists | Bookstore | Weather | Tide Predictions | Bowditch | Trawlerworld |