Re: TWL: San Francisco versus Columbia River
Subject: Re: TWL: San Francisco versus Columbia River
From: Enrique Flicki (eflicki@XXX.XXX)
Date: Sun Dec 01 2002 - 16:51:50 EST
I am getting your mesages with out having requested. Check for virus your
computer
----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Maurice" <mikem@XXX.XXX>
To: <trawler-world-list@XXX.XXX>
Sent: Sunday, December 01, 2002 3:48 PM
Subject: RE: TWL: San Francisco versus Columbia River
> >CR has no protection from surrounding land mass, SF has a fair amount
from
> >the NW.
> >The nearby land mass at CR is mostly sand beach whereas SF is mostly rock
> >and cliffs, which reflect waves back into the ocean, making for a very
> >confused sea on occasion.
>
>
> BTW: Noyo River(Ft. Bragg), Chetco River (Brookings), Quillieutte River
(La
> Push) and Depoe Bay are all surrounded to some extent by rock land mass
and
> when subjected to wave action, especially swell perpendicular to the
rocks,
> the sea state near these entrances can become quite "boistrous".
> They also have another common characteristic, in that they are all quite
> shallow, 5-8 feet.
>
>
>
> Capt. Mike Maurice
> Wilsonville, Near Portland Oregon
> _______________________________________________
> http://lists.samurai.com/mailman/listinfo/trawler-world-list
>
_______________________________________________
http://lists.samurai.com/mailman/listinfo/trawler-world-list
