| Home | Mailing Lists | Bookstore | Weather | Tide Predictions | Bowditch |

Re: TWL: Re: RE: (Not-so-) Bright Work

Subject: Re: TWL: Re: RE: (Not-so-) Bright Work
From: Richard (capnrich@XXX.XXX)
Date: Sun Feb 03 2002 - 14:19:25 EST

• sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Next message: John & Kathleen: "Re: TWL: (Not-so-) Bright Work"
• Previous message: Richard: "Re: TWL: (Not-so-) Bright Work"
• In reply to: Doug Barnard: "TWL: RE: (Not-so-) Bright Work"
• Next in thread: Dr. Al Miller: "TWL: RE: (Not-so-) Bright Work"
• Next in thread: Vaughan Mitchell: "TWL: (Not-so-) Bright Work"
• Reply: Richard: "Re: TWL: Re: RE: (Not-so-) Bright Work"

Cetol is not supposed to be laid down thick. The instructions say to lay
three coats to build coverage. And they mean it. IMHO it is ugly if you do
and it is ugly if you don't.
Richard

• Next message: John & Kathleen: "Re: TWL: (Not-so-) Bright Work"
• Previous message: Richard: "Re: TWL: (Not-so-) Bright Work"
• In reply to: Doug Barnard: "TWL: RE: (Not-so-) Bright Work"
• Next in thread: Dr. Al Miller: "TWL: RE: (Not-so-) Bright Work"
• Next in thread: Vaughan Mitchell: "TWL: (Not-so-) Bright Work"
• Reply: Richard: "Re: TWL: Re: RE: (Not-so-) Bright Work"