|
|
|
|
|||||
|
||||||
Subject: RE: TWL: Re: Battery Conditioners
From: mknott (mknott@XXX.XXX)
Date: Wed Apr 11 2001 - 09:19:35 EDT
>===== Original Message From w russell <wrussell@XXX.XXX> =====
>
>And I now write again,
> Alrid had written that several batteries would not allow the conditioning
>process to work because of the impedence in the connecting cables. To see
>if this was true, tonight I put an oscilloscope on the batteries. With 5
>batteries in parallel, and the BatteryMinder on the center one, I could not
>detect a pulse of any kind on the battery furtherest from the BM unit. As
>I went toward the BM unit the pulse became stronger. When tested with only
>one battery, the pulse was much stronger. So, I guess the word from VDC
>Electronics wasn't that good. Go figure! :) I just wasted two weeks with
>5 batteries on line and didn't do much, if any, good for them. Switched
>back to single battery at a time.
>
Thanks Bill, Brian, Arild and others for continuing to experiment with these
devices and report your findings to the group.
Mel Knott
|