| Home | Mailing Lists | Bookstore | Weather | Tide Predictions | Bowditch |

Re: TWL: Re: Laptops and navigation


Subject: Re: TWL: Re: Laptops and navigation
From: Bob McLeran (

  • Next message: Rick Dufour: "TWL: Photos on line"
  • Previous message: George Geist: "Re: TWL: Onan generator"
  • Next in thread: Dick Nielsen: "Re: TWL: Re: Laptops and navigation"
  • Reply: Dick Nielsen: "Re: TWL: Re: Laptops and navigation"
  • Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

    Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2000 08:20:20 -0400
    From: Grady Lee <>
    Subject: Re: TWL: Re: Laptops and navigation

    I agree, you can not set any system and ignore it. If you do you will
    eventually wind up like the guy Arlid talked about, aground in a
    channel or
    worse, under a freighter.

    I have been in the real-time software business for 25 years. I have
    developed
    navigation software, weapon systems, and other things for the
    military. I now
    perform safety analysis on systems that contain safety critical
    software.
    Systems like fly by wire planes, air traffic control system, and several
    new
    steering systems for cars.

    The navigation software I worked on ran on a computer with 96k and ran
    with many
    other command and control systems on the ship in the same computer. It
    works
    well even today. The captain on the Navy vessel was not relieved of
    responsibility just because he had fancy software to show him the
    closest point
    of approach or the next marker. The captain is still responsible. On
    the
    Chesapeake, I see captains run aground, hit markers, and other boats
    without the
    help of a computer. The irresponsible will have accidents with or
    without a
    computer.

    The computer and software for navigation are only a tool, just like a
    paper
    chart and dividers. I do not feel that I need a $4,000 to $10,000
    computer to
    help me navigate my little boat. I use a Sony Laptop, windows 98, and
    another
    brand of software to assist me in navigation. I use the computer for my

    business when I travel. It has a 10 inch screen. I can navigate well
    with it.
    I use it as a aid, someone is always standing watch and comparing the
    computer
    position to the paper chart. The software and the computer you use
    doesn't
    matter as much as how you use them together to help you navigate.

    I guess the point is that any system built by man can and will probably
    fail,
    the important thing is to be able to recover. On planes, one of the
    human
    factors issues dealing with autopilots is that there is a possibility
    that the
    pilot might not be up to speed on what is happening with the plane if
    there is a
    problem. The same is true with our boat's autopilot, you must keep up
    with what
    is happening so you can take over without a learning curve if there is a

    problem.

    Grady Lee
    M/V Summer Moon
    49' Marine Trader PH
    On the South River in Maryland

    > I'm not saying the guy or gal on watch can read a book while the
    software
    > controls the boat. The most important element in the navigational
    equation
    > is still the gray stuff between our ears.
    >
    > Also, if it's ok to let a $100 computer (a GPS) control your autopilot

    > (itself a computer) then why is it not ok to let a $5,000 to $10,000
    > computer system control the autopilot?
    >
    > Dennis
    >





    | Home | Mailing Lists | Bookstore | Weather | Tide Predictions | Bowditch | Trawlerworld |