RE: [Nml] H.O 211 glitch?
Subject: RE: [Nml] H.O 211 glitch?
From: Russell Sher (rsher@XXX.XXX)
Date: Fri Feb 26 1999 - 09:24:19 EST
A suggestion Joe : Do both methods work from the same assumed position?
regards
Russell
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joe Shields [SMTP:joeshields@XXX.XXX]
> Sent: Friday, February 26, 1999 2:45 PM
> To: navigation@XXX.XXX
> Subject: [Nml] H.O 211 glitch?
>
> Is anyone familiar with H.O. 211 (Ageton)? It is still my favorite
> manual method, and I have done hundreds of sight reductions that work
> out fine. However, this one is driving me crazy. When I use the
> computer or any other method, I get the expected Hc = 38d 30'... but
> when I use H.O. 211, I get 38d 53'. Here is the particulars:
>
> GHA 91d 52'W
> Long 80d 06'W
> LHA 9d 46'W a1 77048
> Decl 9d 22'S +b2 583 a2 78847
> a3 77631 -b3 617
> a4 78230
> K 9d 30'S
> Lat 40d 58'N b3 617 a3 77631
> K~L 50d 28 +b5 19618
> a6 20235 38d 52'?
>
> Anybody see anything I am doing wrong?
> -- Joe Shields
>
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________
> DO YOU YAHOO!?
> Get your free @XXX.XXX
>
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=
> =-= TO UNSUBSCRIBE, send this message to majordomo@XXX.XXX:
> =-=
> =-= unsubscribe navigation
> =-=
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=
=-= TO UNSUBSCRIBE, send this message to majordomo@XXX.XXX: =-=
=-= unsubscribe navigation =-=
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=
