|
|
From: Bill (no email)
Date: Fri Jun 16 2006 - 14:57:13 EDT
Alex wrote:
>> Sorry, I missed the fine print on upper- and lower-limb observation, as
>> well as exactly what standard you were using to determine a negative result.
>> (I still don't have an answer.)
Bill replied:
> I don't understand. What do you mean by a "standard"?
Alex
My question was, what are the negative numbers relative to? Does it mean
that your Ho's are smaller than your Hc's, (Ho < than Hc, plot away from
body). Or if subtracting Ho FROM Hc, that the Ho's are larger than the
Hc's?
Example:
30d (Ho) - 29d (Hc) = +1d
29d (Hc) - 30d (Ho) = -1d
So without some reference or "standard," it was difficult for me to
determine fit the observed angles were smaller or larger than the calculated
angle.
Sorry for the confusion,
Bill
|