Next message: Robert Eno: "Re: Two weeks to Mystic!"
I think that any reasonable navigation question is fair for this list.
Past, current and future technologies can co-exist.
Guy
----- Original Message -----
From: "Carl Herzog" <>
To: <>
Sent: Monday, June 05, 2006 1:20 PM
Subject: Re: New life for Nav-l.
> George Huxtable wrote:
>
>>3. List policy has always been to discourage reference to
>>radio-navigation techniques, except where this was trivial in extent,
>>or had relevance to some discussion of traditional navigation. .... With
>>a new skipper, it
>>may be time to discuss whether that policy should be eased, but until
>>that happens, it seems to me that existing policy should be respected.
>>
>
> I don't contribute enough to earn much right to weigh in on this, but as
> an active lurker, I would prefer to see electronic nav discussion limited.
>
> These days, GPS-related discussion can be had pretty much anywhere. I
> enjoy Nav-l for its exploration of topics no one else would ever be
> talking about.
>
> Carl
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.8.2/356 - Release Date: 6/5/2006
>
>
