Next message: Frank Reed: "An experimental Navigation List"
Frank wrote:
> Just bear in mind that "The Sleepwalkers" is Arthur Koestler's personal
> opinion of how science operates, and many consider it anti-science. His
> "evidence" from history was chosen to match his opinion. Koestler was an
> amateur historian.
Yes. As noted I found it leap frogged about, there was way too much
character development for my tastes, and posturing protagonists and
antagonists. Could have been edited down to 200+ pages IMHO.
While I am not even in the same league history-wise as many list members, I
felt it also glossed over or ignored completely other important
developments. I was not pleased with some of his writing style, such as
references to Plato's Cave before he introduced the actual concept. Had I
not already known, the earlier references would have been lost.
Last, when he notes that so-an-so had it figured out B.C, that was totally
self serving. We are in full agreement. While not meaning to cast stones
at the ancients or their achievements, there were a LOT of theories floating
about. With enough guesses recorded, there was a good chance one or more
was pretty close 2000 years later, be it heliocentricity or the diameter of
the earth.
I recall a passage in one of Feynman's books. He received a message about
the patent for the use of atomic power in aircraft (if I recall). At first
he thought it was a joke or misdirected. Then he remembered the government
had the developers of the atomic bomb brainstorm, and write down any
possible use of atomic power they could dream up--no matter how far
fetched--so the government could patent it in advance!
Bill
