![]() |
|
|||||
|
||||||
From: Bill (no email)
Date: Thu Jan 12 2006 - 16:38:52 EST
Frank Wrote:
> Now it's time to derive the equation
> from scratch. There are several approaches to this. Let's start with the
> refraction-free version and then apply the substitution on the radius of the
> Earth.
>
> Draw yourself an arc of a circle representing the curved surface of the
> Earth. Mark a point A at height h above the surface for the observer's
> position,
> mark point B at height H for the object's position at some distance from A (H
> and h should be roughly comparable heights and both should be much less than
> the radius of the Earth, and mark C for the center of the Earth at the
> center of the arc. Now draw a triangle connecting all three points. The
> lengths of
> the two long sides are R+h and R+H. The length of the other side doesn't
> matter. We want the length of the arc along the Earth's surface connecting
> the
> base of h to the base of H. This length is proportional to the angle in the
> triangle at the Earth's center, C. Let's call that angle phi.
So far crystal clear. Then things get foggy for me.
> With a sextant we
> are measuring the altitude of point B from point A so that means that we
> know the angle in the triangle at point A, let's call that gamma.
Which triangle? The small oblique or large oblique?
Let's call the intersection of the object related to B with the horizon
"HH."
This will form small oblique triangle A B HH A, and we have measured the
angle with our sextant from point A, so angle B A HH. So far all that is
known about the small oblique triangle is one angle, gamma, measured from A.
We also have large oblique triangle, A B C A, and we know 2 sides R+h and
R+H.
> Finally the
> angle at the third corner, B, is related to the other two --it's just 180
> degrees-(gamma+phi). OK so far?
Totally lost. Suspect there is an assumption(s) here I have missed. Unless
A B HH A is treated as a right triangle, I do no have enough information to
determine angle A B HH or A B C (angle at corner B). If I did know angle A
B C, then I could find angle C A B using the law of sines, and of course phi
(angle A C B).
> Now apply the law of sines to the big
> triangle.
> And expand using the rules for sums of angles.
I do not understand "expand using the rules for sums of angles."
I apologize for being thick as a brick, and appreciate your efforts.
Thanks
Bill
|