|
|
|
|
|||||
|
||||||
From: Frank Reed (no email)
Date: Wed Jan 11 2006 - 00:30:29 EST
Bill you wrote:
"I have done three trial runs with the new values, and they seem to approach
reality with the average of mean refraction values derived from the two
methods above, a least when height of eye is 0."
Can you elaborate on this 'reality' you speak of? <g> Seriously, how are you
assessing the results.
-FER
42.0N 87.7W, or 41.4N 72.1W.
www.HistoricalAtlas.com/lunars
|