Next message: Frank Reed: "Re: Green Flash and Longitude"
- Previous message: Royer, Doug: "Re: Green Flash and Longitude"
- Next in thread: Bill: "Re: dip, dip short, distance off with buildings, etc."
- Maybe reply: Bill: "Re: dip, dip short, distance off with buildings, etc."
- Maybe reply: Dan Allen: "Re: dip, dip short, distance off with buildings, etc."
- Maybe reply: Bill: "Re: dip, dip short, distance off with buildings, etc."
- Reply: Marcel E. Tschudin: "Re: dip, dip short, distance off with buildings, etc."
- Maybe reply: Frank Reed: "Re: dip, dip short, distance off with buildings, etc."
- Maybe reply: Frank Reed: "Re: dip, dip short, distance off with buildings, etc."
- Reply: George Huxtable: "Re: dip, dip short, distance off with buildings, etc."
- Maybe reply: Bill: "Re: dip, dip short, distance off with buildings, etc."
- Maybe reply: Bill: "Re: dip, dip short, distance off with buildings, etc."
- Maybe reply: Bill: "Re: dip, dip short, distance off with buildings, etc."
- Maybe reply: Frank Reed: "Re: dip, dip short, distance off with buildings, etc."
- Maybe reply: Frank Reed: "Re: dip, dip short, distance off with buildings, etc."
- Maybe reply: Frank Reed: "Re: dip, dip short, distance off with buildings, etc."
- Maybe reply: Bill: "Re: dip, dip short, distance off with buildings, etc."
- Maybe reply: Frank Reed: "Re: dip, dip short, distance off with buildings, etc."
- Maybe reply: Michael Bradley: "Re: dip, dip short, distance off with buildings, etc."
- Maybe reply: Bill: "Re: dip, dip short, distance off with buildings, etc."
- Maybe reply: Bill: "Re: dip, dip short, distance off with buildings, etc."
- Maybe reply: Bill: "Re: dip, dip short, distance off with buildings, etc."
- Maybe reply: Bill: "Re: dip, dip short, distance off with buildings, etc."
- Maybe reply: Frank Reed: "Re: dip, dip short, distance off with buildings, etc."
- Maybe reply: Frank Reed: "Re: dip, dip short, distance off with buildings, etc."
- Maybe reply: Frank Reed: "Re: dip, dip short, distance off with buildings, etc."
- Maybe reply: Frank Reed: "Re: dip, dip short, distance off with buildings, etc."
- Maybe reply: Bill: "Re: dip, dip short, distance off with buildings, etc."
- Maybe reply: Bill: "Re: dip, dip short, distance off with buildings, etc."
- Maybe reply: Frank Reed: "Re: dip, dip short, distance off with buildings, etc."
- Maybe reply: Frank Reed: "Re: dip, dip short, distance off with buildings, etc."
- Maybe reply: Frank Reed: "Re: dip, dip short, distance off with buildings, etc."
- Maybe reply: Bill: "Re: dip, dip short, distance off with buildings, etc."
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
[ attachment ]
In Bowditch and elsewhere, there are formulas for dip, dip short, Table XV
for distance based on measured height, maximum visibility distance, etc., and
they all have various mysterious corrections for "mean refraction". I've got
this stuff all figured out pretty well now, and it turns out that there is a
really easy, though somewhat bizarre (!), way of thinking about the effect of
refraction in terrestrial, or coastal navigation, situations.
You can calculate dip or the altitude of a tall building peeking up from
beyond the horizon using straight Euclidean geometry and trigonometry ignoring
refraction completely. Then to include refraction, you simply change the
radius of the Earth from R to R/(1-x) where x depends on the temperature gradient
of the atmosphere. On average it's about 0.15 but it can easily be anywhere
in the range 0.13 to 0.17 and sometimes it's as low as 0 or as high as 1.0
(temperature inversions yield higher values of x).
This works perfectly to derive the equations in Bowditch for dip, dip short,
Table XV, and apparently everything else where terrestrial refraction is
involved. Details upon request...
-FER
42.0N 87.7W, or 41.4N 72.1W.
www.HistoricalAtlas.com/lunars