Jimmy Cornell - World Cruising Routes World Cruising Routes by Jimmy Cornell

      

Other books by Jimmy Cornell
| Home | Mailing Lists | Bookstore | Weather | Tide Predictions | Bowditch |

Re: GPS shortcomings.

From: Robert Eno (no email)
Date: Sat Jun 11 2005 - 22:14:26 EDT

  • Next message: Lu Abel: "Re: Plastic vs Metal"

    I agree. In fact I acclimatize my sextant no matter what the temperature but
    this is especially necessary with sub-zero temperatures where the IC can
    change very significantly when brought from room temperature to -30 C.
    Under such conditions, it is necessary to allow your sextant to sit outside
    for at least 15 minutes.

    Robert
    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Frank Reed" <>
    To: <>
    Sent: Saturday, June 11, 2005 5:41 PM
    Subject: Re: GPS shortcomings.

    > Jared you wrote:
    > "But in theory a good navigator would allow a sextant to acclimate to
    > heat/cold and then recheck the index error before using it."
    >
    > Yes, I agree. You absolutely should do this, and it's even a good idea
    > with
    > a metal sextant if the temperature is extreme. When it's near zero
    > degrees
    > (Fahrenheit --yes, cold) even a metal sextant will change its IC as it
    > cools
    > off, in my experience. But even when a plastic sextant has been allowed
    > to
    > reach ambient temperature, you can still expect relatively worse results
    > than you
    > will get from a metal sextant. In practice for typical expectations for
    > celestial navigation, it's not really a big deal. You can even shoot
    > demanding
    > sights like lunars with a plastic sextant if you don't mind errors as big
    > as a
    > couple of minutes of arc (corresponding to an error of one degree in
    > longitude).
    >
    > By the way, plastic sextants also seem to have significantly larger shade
    > error than metal sextants. With some patience, you can measure and record
    > this
    > error for each shade and apply it to your sights. It'll help, but it's
    > still
    > a plastic sextant.
    >
    > If you want a historical parallel, at least into the first third of the
    > 19th
    > century, many navigators at sea carried octants made of wood, often
    > ebony,
    > and a sextant made of metal. The expensive, delicate, and accurate
    > sextant was
    > specifically reserved for shooting lunar distances while the cheaper,
    > less
    > accurate octants were used for shooting ordinary altitudes. If you ever
    > find
    > yourself in a position to "demo" lunars or other historical navigation
    > techniques, you might use a plastic sextant as a stand-in for the old
    > octant.
    >
    > -FER
    > 42.0N 87.7W, or 41.4N 72.1W.
    > www.HistoricalAtlas.com/lunars


  • Next message: Lu Abel: "Re: Plastic vs Metal"



    | Home | Mailing Lists | Bookstore | Weather | Tide Predictions | Bowditch | Trawlerworld |