Don Casey - Dragged Aboard Storm Tactics Handbook:
Modern Methods of Heaving-To for Survival in Extreme Conditions
by Lin Pardey and Larry Pardey


      

Other books by Lin and Larry Pardey
| Home | Mailing Lists | Bookstore | Weather | Tide Predictions | Bowditch |

Re: Angles *ARE* Ratios

From: Frank Reed (no email)
Date: Mon May 16 2005 - 23:25:06 EDT

  • Next message: Frank Reed: "Re: Almanac data in 1855 (British vs American)"

    Peter you wrote:
    "any chance of some more detail on this issue?"

    Sure. I should say up-front that it's no big deal, and you're probably
    familiar with all of this but I'll just write a bit, and see if it goes anywhere.

    Angles ARE ratios. This is the fundamental definition of an angle.

    Almost all of us learn about angles at a very early stage of our education
    and we learn how to use angles, how to picture them and compare them, and we
    learn to count them in degrees. But the idea of defining an angle is usually
    left for much later, and by then students are so familiar with angles that the
    importance of the definition gets lost. An angle is the ratio of the length
    of an arc of a circle to its radius. That's all --nothing more. And because
    of this, angle have no units. Like any fraction, any ratio, they are pure
    numbers (no feet or meters or other physical units). So if I have an object
    that's a foot across and it's a hundred feet away from me, then its angular size,
    the angle it subtends, will be 1/100. Most of the time, people refer to this
    as an angle "measured in radians" but this is really an accident of history
    and education. An angle is just a ratio, and it's not really "supposed to"
    have any name after it.

    Of course for those of us who enjoy sextants and angle measuring, we like to
    convert angles to the familiar ancient sexagesimal terms. And to do that,
    it's very convenient to memorize the number of degrees or minutes or arcseconds
    in a unit angle. If an angle is 0.001, for example, we can express it in
    minutes of arc by multiplying by 3438 to get 3.4 minutes, or in degrees by
    multiplying by 57.3, or in arcseconds by multiplying by 206265.

    If I want to know the angular size of my fist is at arm's length, I just
    divide 4 inches by 28 inches. That's an angle of 1/7 (or, multiplying by 57,
    just about 8 degrees). And note that none of this has anything to do with sines
    and tangents and all that. We only need those when we know that the geometry
    is a true triangle.

    -FER
    42.0N 87.7W, or 41.4N 72.1W.
    www.HistoricalAtlas.com/lunars


  • Next message: Frank Reed: "Re: Almanac data in 1855 (British vs American)"



    | Home | Mailing Lists | Bookstore | Weather | Tide Predictions | Bowditch | Trawlerworld |