|
|
|
|
|||||
|
||||||
From: Bill (no email)
Date: Fri Apr 22 2005 - 17:42:12 EDT
> Bill wrote:
> "Big difference between the two formulas when the elevation
> gets into miles."
Frank replied:
> Yes, and given today's cheap computing, might as well use the exponential
> formula. By the way, you can also use it to answer the question "where does
> space begin?" Just set the equation for density of the air:
> density = exp(-altitude/34,000feet)
> equal to 0 and solve for the altitude. :-)
Having little success with modifying the formula with my math skills.
Trying to manipulate the exponent and or find the nth root of zero has me
off in deep space.
Did try the plug and chug method with the TI-30, and ran out of computing
power approx. 1277 nm. Looks like with enough computing power it could go on
like pi. Interesting as I would have thought the value would have been in
the 60-120 nm range. It did lead me to check out the Federation
Aeronautique Internationale's definitions for outer space, which are located
at:
http://encyclopedia.laborlawtalk.com/Outer_space
Two values that interested me:
Reentry from orbit begins at 122 km
100 km - Aerodynamic surfaces no longer function
As to the bigger question, "where does space begin?" (Or end?) After
reviewing the works of philosophers, mathematicians, and physicists--and
using two TI-30Xa calculators simultaneously-- I arrived at the value "42."
Back to Schaum's Theory and Problems of Basic Mathematics,
Bill
|