Check out the bookstore at IRBS.com
| Home | Mailing Lists | Bookstore | Weather | Tide Predictions | Bowditch |

Re: Moon Parallax, Math Trivia (was Re: venus)

From: Frank Reed (no email)
Date: Wed Oct 20 2004 - 18:35:53 EDT

  • Next message: Herbert Prinz: "Re: Uses of almanacs for astrology"

    Herbert P wrote:
    "I believe you are mistaken. There is no resemblance to Kepler's
    equation. The characteristic feature of the latter is that the variable
    E (eccentric anomaly) appears as a term E as well as a term sin E,
    making it impossible to express E as explicit function of the mean
    anomaly. "

    Here's the direct equation for the calculation of the true altitude from the
    observed altitude and the horizontal parallax:
      TA = OA - HP cos TA .
    OK? You agree, I hope, that this bears a very STRONG resemblance to Kepler's
    equation. Now invert it. Solve for TA. Can't be done in "closed form", right?
    See what I mean now?? If you solve this iteratively for TA to, say, one part
    in a million and then compare with the Arctan solution, you will get slightly
    different results. They are not inverses. They solve slightly different
    mathematical problems. That's the "trivia" I was getting at.

    Frank R
    [ ] Mystic, Connecticut
    [X] Chicago, Illinois


  • Next message: Herbert Prinz: "Re: Uses of almanacs for astrology"



    | Home | Mailing Lists | Bookstore | Weather | Tide Predictions | Bowditch | Trawlerworld |