|
|
|
|
|||||
|
||||||
From: Ken Gebhart (no email)
Date: Sat Oct 16 2004 - 21:02:09 EDT
on 10/13/04 2:16 AM, Alexandre Eremenko at wrote:
> I agree that the "justification" of Cel Nav as
> a "backup for GPS" cannot be defended.
> GPS is indeed more precise, more reliable and easier
> to use.
>
My only rejoinder to this is that when one goes to sea, he should have a
manual way of doing anything that is important. CN and a compass is the
only manual way to navigate at sea (apart from watching the contrails).
Ken Gebhart
|