Check out the bookstore at IRBS.com
| Home | Mailing Lists | Bookstore | Weather | Tide Predictions | Bowditch |

Re: Historical Magnetic Variation/Declination

From: Frank Reed (no email)
Date: Sat Jun 19 2004 - 16:26:26 EDT

  • Next message: Brooke Clarke: "Re: Historical Magnetic Variation/Declination"

    Jared S wrote:
    "If we lose the magnetic field, we'll lose our entire "shielding" and we'll
    be so badly zapped by all kinds of energy that the GPS will be the least of
    anyone's concerns.  With all the money you save not buying sextant stock, you can
    buy deep mine shafts. No magnetic
    field for any length of time would mean some serious problems for life as we
    know it."

    It's not quite that bad. Most of the radiation shielding comes from the
    atmosphere. When you fly in a plane at 35,000 feet (as I'll be doing tomorrow
    morning), you're exposed to radiation levels that are dozens of times higher than
    at sea level. Yet airline flight crews who spend long periods of time at these
    altitudes show no (or ambiguous) evidence of health effects.

    That said, sure, if the field strength drops for a few thousand years, cancer
    rates would probably increase measurably. Are we doomed? Well, there have
    been dozens of polarity reversals in the past fifty million years, and no major
    extinction events. So no. Probably not doomed. Sicker? Yes.

    And added:
    "No one really wants to spend the money on the basic science needed to look
    into this in real detail, it just isn't sexy enough, or urgent-seeming enough"

    Well, we do spend a lot of money on cancer treatment. Since that's the
    primary health effect, it probably makes sense at a public policy level to work on
    all forms of cancer instead of those specifically related to increased cosmic
    ray levels.

    And there's another problem besides lack of urgency. No one really has any
    great ideas on what to do! After centuries of study, we still only have computer
    simulations that *may* mimic features of the dynamics of the Earth's core
    (and they do show random fluctuations and polarity reversals, so they *seem*
    relevant at least). But we really don't know what's going on 4000 miles beneath
    our feet, and there doesn't seem to be any way to get around that basic
    ignorance.

    Frank R
    [ ] Mystic, Connecticut
    [X] Chicago, Illinois


  • Next message: Brooke Clarke: "Re: Historical Magnetic Variation/Declination"



    | Home | Mailing Lists | Bookstore | Weather | Tide Predictions | Bowditch | Trawlerworld |