Check out the bookstore at IRBS.com
| Home | Mailing Lists | Bookstore | Weather | Tide Predictions | Bowditch |

Re: Lunars: Jupiter's BIG.

From: Fred Hebard (no email)
Date: Sat Dec 20 2003 - 15:03:18 EST

  • Next message: Pierre Boucher: "Re: December Solstice"

    Frank,

    I reduced your data and plotted your lunar times against the time of
    observation, below. The data look very nice; not as good as the lunar
    of that Australian explorer Kieran Kelly discussed a few months ago,
    but very good. The line is a least squares fit of a straight line.

    Interestingly, I usually plot the raw distance against the time of
    observation and use the least squares fit to pick out a point for
    reduction. In this case, I chose your first observation, which was out
    by 48 seconds. I should have chosen the third or fourth observation,
    which, being in the middle, were closer to the fit of the line to the
    average of the observations.

    I think perhaps the old method of using the mean of the observations
    would be better than using a line of best fit, although plotting the
    data instantly tells one how good they are. Using the mean, the time
    would have been out by 8 seconds, about 2 minutes of longitude.

    Fred

    Obs# time of observation time from lunar diff
    1 12/19/03 9:30:37 12/19/03 9:31:24 48
    2 12/19/03 9:33:31 12/19/03 9:34:28 58
    3 12/19/03 9:36:15 12/19/03 9:35:50 -24
    4 12/19/03 9:39:15 12/19/03 9:39:37 23
    5 12/19/03 9:43:30 12/19/03 9:43:35 6
    6 12/19/03 9:48:15 12/19/03 9:47:30 -45
    7 12/19/03 9:52:30 12/19/03 9:52:22 -7


    On Dec 20, 2003, at 3:53 AM, Frank Reed wrote:

    > When you shoot lunars with Jupiter, you soon discover that the giant
    > planet has a visible semidiameter through a good sextant. The accepted
    > practice is to split the planet -- you take it to the Moon's limb and
    > place the disk of the planet as best you can with its center right on
    > the limb so that the planet is split in half along the Moon's limb.
    > That's do-able...
    >
    > Fortunately, Jupiter is far enough away that parallax is no issue
    > (it's always less than 0.04 minutes of arc for Jupiter).
    >
    > If anyone's interested, here's a set of Jupiter-Moon lunars from last
    > night taken with a reliable Plath sextant:
    >
    > Index Correction: +0.7
    > Assumed Position: Lat = 41d 22N, Lon = 71d 57W
    > Temp: 30F. Pressure: Normal.
    >
    > All Lunars are Jupiter-Moon-Far Limb. Times are EST (US Eastern
    > Standard Time). Sights start at Greenwich Date 12/19/2003, 09:30:
    >
    > 04:30:37,  43d 49.5
    > 04:33:31,  43d 51.1
    > 04:36:15,  43d 51.7
    > 04:39:15,  43d 53.7
    > 04:43:30,  43d 55.7
    > 04:48:15,  43d 57.6
    > 04:52:30,  44d 00.1
    >
    > Enjoy!
    >
    > Frank E. Reed
    > [X] Mystic, Connecticut
    > [ ] Chicago, Illinois



  • Next message: Pierre Boucher: "Re: December Solstice"



    | Home | Mailing Lists | Bookstore | Weather | Tide Predictions | Bowditch | Trawlerworld |