![]() |
|
|||||
|
||||||
From: George Huxtable (no email)
Date: Sat Sep 06 2003 - 06:15:34 EDT
Peter Fogg has asked, with some justification in my view, for clarification
about the wording of a Silicon Sea exercise, set by Dan Hogan on 9th June,
with should perhaps have been numbered 87, though it was at the time
numbered 78.
He sent a message to the list on 22 August with the subject "SS: Leg 87
questions", which in response to one question stated "Here I'm lost", and
ended "Is there a problem here? Or am I not understanding something?"
Rather to my surprise, there seems to have been no response to this plea
from anyone on the Silicon Sea team.
More recently, on 5 Sept, in the thread "Principles and being practical" he
said-
>Some weeks ago I posted my go at one
>current Silicon Sea exercise and then details of a problem I was having with
>the one before, and I have yet to hear a peep from any expert.
Perhaps that valid point got lost because it was submerged in a diatribe
about other matters.
And yet up to now there's been no response to his plea, about a problem
which puzzles me too, when I look at its wording. So I wish to add my voice
to his, and ask for a bit of further explanation (or perhaps
reconsideration) about that problem and the way it was posed.
George.
================================================================
contact George Huxtable by email at , by phone at
01865 820222 (from outside UK, +44 1865 820222), or by mail at 1 Sandy
Lane, Southmoor, Abingdon, Oxon OX13 5HX, UK.
================================================================
|