![]() |
|
|||||
|
||||||
Subject: Re: The mil as a unit of angle.
From: Trevor J. Kenchington (Gadus@XXX.XXX)
Date: Thu Mar 13 2003 - 22:33:23 EST
I see that I dropped a couple of "Norths" in my last posting. It should
have read:
> 300 mils would be North North East one-half North. There is no such
> thing as North North East by North, which would be a full point northward
> from North North East and so identical to North by East (i.e. 200 mil).
> The odd-numbered points are always named from the nearest cardinal or
> ordinal point (e.g. North or North East), not from the intermediate
> ("inter-ordinal"?) ones like North North East.
Nothing like a few dropped words to make a confusing topic incomprehensible.
Trevor Kenchington
-- Trevor J. Kenchington PhD Gadus@XXX.XXX Gadus Associates, Office(902) 889-9250 R.R.#1, Musquodoboit Harbour, Fax (902) 889-9251 Nova Scotia B0J 2L0, CANADA Home (902) 889-3555Science Serving the Fisheries http://home.istar.ca/~gadus
|