![]() |
|
|||||
|
||||||
Subject: Re: accuracy of automatic celestial navigation
From: Jared Sherman (jared.sherman@XXX.XXX)
Date: Fri Dec 06 2002 - 16:59:27 EST
Paul-
<e. Celestial Navigation. Celestial navigation, as traditionally
practiced, provides an average error in position of 2 nm.>
You don't know HOW GLAD I am to see that from that source. Here I was, getting 2 to 2.5nm errors on dry land and saying to myself I ought to be able to get closer than that.
Which opens the other topic...Is that "good enough for government work" or simply as good as it gets?<G>
|