|
|
|
|
|||||
|
||||||
Subject: Re: Meridional Distances
From: Paul Hirose (paulhirose@XXX.XXX)
Date: Thu Sep 19 2002 - 19:21:03 EDT
Vic Fraenckel wrote:
>
> My routines give the azimuth (referenced to true north) of the second point
> from the first point (and the azimuth from the second point to the first
> point - NOT recipricals on an ellipse).
Yes, that's what I figured you meant. I don't even know what a
reciprocal on an ellipse is. My point was that the Mercator methods
yield a rhumb line, which is easier to follow. You simply keep a
constant heading throughout the voyage. (I'm ignoring variation etc.
for simplicity.)
On the other hand, computing the azimuth from Point A to Point B
yields the initial heading for a great circle course. However, if the
vessel stays on that heading it will miss Point B. The miss may be
trivial or huge, depending on distance and the lat/lon of the points.
The rhumb line and great circle methods both have their place in the
navigator's arsenal.
|