|
|
|
|
|||||
|
||||||
Subject: Re: Sextant Positions versus Map Datums?
From: Jared Sherman (jared.sherman@XXX.XXX)
Date: Thu Jan 17 2002 - 13:18:18 EST
Interestingly enough I have gotten a response on this from the ask@XXX.XXX
They directed me to a datum conversion program (CORPSCAN) which is publicly available but mainly limited to NAD27 and NAD84, NAD84 arguably being "substantially identical" etcetera to the later US domestic datums.
There is also a more advanced tool available from NIMA but that can only be downloaded to recipients having .MIL and .GOV email addresses--if someone here has one of those I'll be glad to give them a URL if they can make it available afterwards.
Anyway...using CORPSCAN in the area of N40d 35.703m, W073d 29.596m and inputting that as NAD84, that position shifts by some 38 meters when translated to NAD27. (38 meters found by taking the offsets produced by the program and calculating the length of the diagonal.)
And that ignores the question of whether land maps (topos) may be using various state co-ordinate systems...I have no idea about the topos, have only used them on a limited "we're here" basis in the past when hiking.
I don't think anyone would argue about 38 meters when doing sextant navigation, just note that there is that much difference simply from a datum shift--so there *must* be some difference between astronomical positions and positions taken from various map datums showing landmarks. Hopefully less with the newer datums.
|