Next message: (no name): "lv-ab: CQR wear limits (was: Simpson Lawrence custome service issues)"
I thought the number was actually 15% rather than 10%. Some marinas get
around this limitation by classifying tenants as "extended stay" or
"transient." We used to live at a marina that was probably 50% or more
liveaboards.
The city of Brisbane which operates Sierra Point Marina is in the process of
ousting all liveaboards. The interim harbormaster is also the chief of
police and is "cleaning house." Some of the tenants have banded together and
are fighting it. Some of the tenants have been there for 12 years. We wish
them well and hope that things turn out OK.
Regards,
Dave Benjamin
Aboard S/V Entropy
A Freedom 39 catrigged ketch
Grand Marina, Alameda, CA
http://www.optimalsolutions.com/sailinks.html
> -----Original Message-----
> From:
> [mailto:]On Behalf Of David Lyon
> Sent: Monday, August 02, 1999 11:37 AM
> To: ;
> Subject: Re: lv-ab: LB on Pac Coast Summary
>
>
> The legal limit of CA liveaboards being 10% of the slips is I
> believe only
> true for San Fransisco Bay, due to liveaboard boats being
> considered to be
> the same as dredging spoils, limiting access of the public to the Bay, and
> hence placing them under the jurisdiction of BCDC, who doesn't like them.
> I think 10% was sort of a "grandfathered" number. And some marinas have
> none, perhaps didn't have any at the time when the regs hit. fwiw to make
> sense out of a crazy deal.
>
> - David
> __________________________________________________________________
> _________
> || The Live-Aboard List : send a "subscribe" or "unsubscribe"
> request ||
> || in body of message to:
> ||
>
>
___________________________________________________________________________
|| The Live-Aboard List : send a "subscribe" or "unsubscribe" request ||
|| in body of message to: ||
