From: Ken James (no email)
Date: Sun Apr 08 2007 - 22:04:47 EDT
>
> Ken James rebutted with:
>
>> The most expensive solar panels are nearing 40%.
>>
>
>
> REPLY
> The real question is how many $$ per watt produced when comparing the two
> methods.
> Arild
>
It all depends on the application and the goals. For a house in AZ maybe
either would do well, for a small cabin in Canada in the winter, maybe
solar panels would work better and last longer.
My point with that is that no one solution will prove to be the best for
all applications and all times. -Ken
___________________________________________________________________________
|| The Live-Aboard List : send a "subscribe" or "unsubscribe" request ||
|| in body of message to: ||
|