Don Casey - Dragged Aboard Dragged Aboard by Don Casey
A Cruising Guide for the Reluctant Mate


      

Other books by Don Casey
| Home | Mailing Lists | Bookstore | Weather | Tide Predictions | Bowditch |

RE: lv-ab: Melbourne Anchoring Ordinance - derelict boats

From: Norman Johnson (no email)
Date: Sat Oct 07 2006 - 16:34:34 EDT

  • Next message: Norm of Bandersnatch: "lv-ab: RE: T&T: Re: Re: West Marine marketing"

    I believe that derelict boats are by definition abandoned. If they are
    abandoned, can they not be treated just as abandoned automobiles are?

    Norm
    S/V Bandersnatch
    Lying 30 07.7N 081 39.6W
    Julington Creek Estuary FL
     

    > [Original Message]
    > From: Lee Huddleston <>
    > To: <>
    > Date: 10/6/2006 5:44:29 PM
    > Subject: lv-ab: Melbourne Anchoring Ordinance
    >
    > If we help the Melbourne authorities draft an ordinance that accomplishes
    > what they want (keeping derelict boats from parking long-term in their
    > area) while it avoids damaging our needs and desires (free anchoring areas
    > for long-term cruisers) and if it is successful in taking care of both
    > tasks, we can then convince other communities all over the country, if not
    > the world, to adopt the same ordinance. It sounds too optimistic, but
    that
    > is exactly how both good and bad laws get spread.
    >
    > There is no need for excessive legalizee or jargon. The plainer the
    > language, the better the law. Often poorly drafted laws are like
    > old-fashioned tuna nets, they sweep up dolphins and turtle as well as the
    > intended catch. The ordinance we need to draft for Melbourne should be as
    > precise as possible. What is it they do not want in their area?
    "Derelict"
    > is not sufficently specific. Fuzzy, general terms don't give the public
    > fair warning of what is and is not permitted. They also don't give enough
    > guidance to police officers who want to follow the law. Nor do they
    > constrain bad officers who want to work mischief.
    >
    > Help come up with the correct language. What would be fair? What strikes
    > the correct balance between prevention of "blight" and freedom? It needs
    > to be something that is easily measured, like "boat must be moved every X
    > number of days" and/or "boat must be occupied X percent of the time."
    > Something like "boat must be maintained in seaworthy condition" may be
    > attractive, but it adds subjectivity. If we use that type of language we
    > should at least try to list elements that make a boat unseaworthy or
    > seaworthy.
    >
    > We all like to complain about "them." Here is our opportunity to be
    > "them." If we show Melbourne that the cruising community is willing to
    > help find the solution rather than just being negative, we can build
    > rapport that may have far-reaching benefits.
    >
    > Lee Huddleston
    > s/v Truelove
    >
    >
    ___________________________________________________________________________
    > || The Live-Aboard List : send a "subscribe" or "unsubscribe" request
    ||
    > || in body of message to:
    ||

    ___________________________________________________________________________
    || The Live-Aboard List : send a "subscribe" or "unsubscribe" request ||
    || in body of message to: ||


  • Next message: Norm of Bandersnatch: "lv-ab: RE: T&T: Re: Re: West Marine marketing"



    | Home | Mailing Lists | Bookstore | Weather | Tide Predictions | Bowditch | Trawlerworld |