Check out the bookstore at IRBS.com
| Home | Mailing Lists | Bookstore | Weather | Tide Predictions | Bowditch |

lv-ab: Beating a dead horse---your risk, not mine

From: Judy Rouse (no email)
Date: Wed Oct 05 2005 - 10:47:53 EDT

  • Next message: RLESLIE: "Re: lv-ab: a live-aboard question...really"

    On Tuesday, October 04, 2005 7:53 PM, Richard Goodwin wrote:

    "> No - YOU may be able to chose to live a few houses
    > up the street, but
    > as someone has pointed out, the safer areas are more
    > expensive. Not
    > everyone has that choice.

    Well I guess we're getting finally to the root of the
    misunderstanding about all this. Everywhere I have
    ever seen real estate prices, ocean front property is
    WAY MORE EXPENSIVE than non-ocean front property.

    You are saying it is the other way around. I have
    never seen or heard of such a thing."
    -------------
    Dick,

    This does explain part of the "misunderstanding" about all this, but I also
    think many of us have a fundamental disagreement of ideas regarding societal
    and governmental roles in assisting those who suffer damages in natural
    disasters. To each his own in this regard. It doesn't really matter what
    individuals think because this little group will have no impact on
    population at large.

    All that said, I can assure you that property can be purchased at most any
    location on the Texas or Louisiana Gulf coast for a fraction of much of the
    land values inland. For example, prior to the last two hurricanes, I could
    purchase the same size little spit of unimproved land (50x100) in Bolivar
    directly behind the vegetation line (the building requirement for this
    state) for approx 60k. Whereas the same-sized land value for our home is
    350k, located 50 miles inland and in the city. And our current property is
    still considered to be in a flood zone--the 500 year flood plain. Suburban
    land values are obviously less than our home property, but still more than
    the beach fronts. There might be a few pockets where the beach front land
    is more expensive, like the extremely few inlets that would allow
    construction of a dock adjacent to the property. But in general the coast
    land is less expensive for several reasons. You buy it totally at your own
    risk.

    One cannot obtain Title Insurance for the beach front property. And, unless
    things have changed very recently, one also cannot purchase homeowners
    insurance for beach front property. And when hurricanes or storms change
    the vegetation line, you cannot rebuild your home if the line moves back
    onto your property. Happened every few years.

    I have no idea if that is true in Mississippi or Alabama. Common sense
    would indicate to me that their beach front property is more in line with
    that of Florida, i.e., higher land value for waterfront property. Their
    coastal property seems much more commercial than that of Louisiana or Texas.

    Judy

    ___________________________________________________________________________
    || The Live-Aboard List : send a "subscribe" or "unsubscribe" request ||
    || in body of message to: ||


  • Next message: RLESLIE: "Re: lv-ab: a live-aboard question...really"



    | Home | Mailing Lists | Bookstore | Weather | Tide Predictions | Bowditch | Trawlerworld |