![]() |
|
|||||
|
||||||
From: Richard Goodwin (no email)
Date: Tue Oct 04 2005 - 19:23:52 EDT
> If you live in Massachusetts, you have ice storms
> and blizzards
> instead. And tornados are everywhere. You don't
> have to live in the
> midwest to have tornado damage.
So what? Do you see thousands of homeless people
lookng for shelter after an ice storm? Or a blizzard?
You can't compare these things to what happened in
New Orleans.
As I said earlier, if I live in a house not built on
stilts, on the ocean in New England, it is likely to
be washed away by a storm at any time.
But I can choose to live a few houses up the street
and have no such risk.
That's what I'm talking about. You CAN choose to live
in a less risky place. Obviously.
> >And it simply isn't true that there aren't safer
> >places to live than the riskiest locations.
> >
> >I have no idea why you would think otherwise.
> >
> I think otherwise because I've lived all over the
> country, from Boston
> to Key West to California. I know there are hazards
> everywhere.
Yes there are hazards everywhere. But you didn't
address what I said, did you. Good technique for a
politician. C'mon, Rosalie, tell us, are you running
for President...? :-))
Dick
__________________________________
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
http://mail.yahoo.com
___________________________________________________________________________
|| The Live-Aboard List : send a "subscribe" or "unsubscribe" request ||
|| in body of message to: ||
|