![]() |
|
|||||
|
||||||
From: A Jensen (no email)
Date: Wed Aug 25 2004 - 17:00:42 EDT
Seems to me the thread has wandered prety far from the original issue of
whether or not singl ehanding a vessel should be exempt or voided by the
insurance company.
However taking the issue of self insurance into a morality issue is geting
a littel far feched.
I once worked for a private marina that self insured al their inventory.
In any given year they usually sold a couple of hundred boats in the 30 -
50 foot size.
The cost of insursance is based on a % of appraised value of the boat being
insured.
The company choose to self insure for a simple reason.
If a boat was damaged, the insurance company would still be coming to them
to make the repairs.
After all they were the only dealer for hundred of miles around and they
were the biggest yard with complete facilities for all types of repairs.
In all the years they had been in business, they had never had a serious
incident.
The service people like me who had to drive their boats as part of the job
had to demonstrate the necessary skill and responsibility in order to be
trusted with a half million dollar boat.
The cost of special boat insurance would simply have been an additional and
unnecessary expense.
Now how is that being morally bankrupt?
Arild
--- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.742 / Virus Database: 495 - Release Date: 8/19/2004 ___________________________________________________________________________ || The Live-Aboard List : send a "subscribe" or "unsubscribe" request || || in body of message to: ||
|