Don Casey - Dragged Aboard Dragged Aboard by Don Casey
A Cruising Guide for the Reluctant Mate


      

Other books by Don Casey
| Home | Mailing Lists | Bookstore | Weather | Tide Predictions | Bowditch |

Re: lv-ab: Re: Worthless Circuitbreakers

From: ahmet erkan (no email)
Date: Tue Sep 02 2003 - 23:07:21 EDT

  • Next message: Stan Gardner: "Re: lv-ab: Re: Worthless Circuitbreakers"

    Lew,

    I think you read only half of what I wrote. Here is the other half :

    Ahmet Erkan Wrote :
    "IMHO it is an undesirable and potentially unsafe situation to rely on
    mechanical contacts interrupting large currents on a regular basis. The
    manufacturer of the windlass should provide some form of electronic sensing
    and maybe timing of the overload condition and either sounding an alarm or
    overriding the operator controls. (For mission critical equipment such as a
    windlass there should also be an override for the protection circuit that
    can be activated in the heat of a battle.)"

    Yes I agree with you once again, a circuit breaker or a fuse should be there
    as means to survive a malfunction. As said before my humble "WRONG" opinion
    is we should not rely on mechanical contacts to interrupt large currents on
    a regular basis. (BTW: relays also have mechanical contacts.)

    Why do you have to be so hostile when someone is agreeing with you ?

    We are all sailors here trying to benefit from each others area of
    expertise. Stop this nonsense and buy me a beer when we meet.

    If hundreds of amperes can be controlled by modulating a only few amperes
    through a transistor, then that is what makes sense to utilize as a means of
    protectionl on a regular basis.
    Once an arc is striked in a DC circuit, the electrodes (or contacts inside a
    circuit breaker) have to be seperated a large distance before the arc
    extinguishes, any welder will tell you that. So why use the arc generating
    DC circuit breaker to interrupt the current on a regular basis. Norm has a
    lot of wisdom about a lot of things but he ought to stop tripping his DC
    circuit brakers, just in case the theory is right.

    BTW (By The Way) the phrase "Current Flow" is redundant. Current does not
    flow, "charge" flows, current is "rate of flow of charge". This is another
    misconcemption people have, just like the characteristics of molded case
    circuit breakers.

    Regards,

    Ahmet

    _________________________________________________________________
    Help protect your PC: Get a free online virus scan at McAfee.com.
    http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963

    ___________________________________________________________________________
    || The Live-Aboard List : send a "subscribe" or "unsubscribe" request ||
    || in body of message to: ||


  • Next message: Stan Gardner: "Re: lv-ab: Re: Worthless Circuitbreakers"



    | Home | Mailing Lists | Bookstore | Weather | Tide Predictions | Bowditch | Trawlerworld |