![]() |
|
|||||
|
||||||
From: Enriquez, Michael (no email)
Date: Thu Mar 06 2003 - 09:39:14 EST
I have one, not in use, but it is also 5 watts. It was used once before, by
the original owner, when we were offshore and well out of cell phone range.
It worked like a charm.
_Mike
-----Original Message-----
From: Ron Rogers [mailto:]
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 9:12 AM
To: Windwalker;
Subject: Re: lv-ab: Re: WIRELESS
I believe that bag phones are limited to 3 watts.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Windwalker" <>
To: <>
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 4:32 PM
Subject: Re: lv-ab: Re: WIRELESS
> What I did was about the same. Although I use a 5 watt "bag" phone.
> with a external antenna. The antenna is atop the mast, and gives excellent
> coverage.
___________________________________________________________________________
|| The Live-Aboard List : send a "subscribe" or "unsubscribe" request ||
|| in body of message to: ||
*****************************************************************************
The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged.
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else
is unauthorized.
If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution
or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited
and may be unlawful. When addressed to our clients any opinions or advice
contained in this email are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in
the governing KPMG client engagement letter.
*****************************************************************************
___________________________________________________________________________
|| The Live-Aboard List : send a "subscribe" or "unsubscribe" request ||
|| in body of message to: ||
|